실질적 처분권과 몰수.추징의 대상인 뇌물

• 영문명: Transfer of substantial disposition and bribe confiscated or collection of the corresponding value
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 이승준(Lee, Seung-Jun)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제22권 제4호, 281~306쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.02.06

영문 초록

To be the subject of confiscation depends on not registration but transfer of substantial disposition. Then, considering the decision process of selecting and using a leased vehicle, time, and reason and process of change in ownership, the vehicle substantially belons to the defendant in the target judgement. It is not proper that the defendant did not deliver substantial dispoistion because he has not received previously related documents. Because the whether or not the establishment of bribery is influenced by the accidental circumstances of transfer of the relevant documents. So it is valid to seize from the accused. Considering the legal personality of the penalty of confiscation, The defendant shall forfeit the equivalent of a lease fee and it is not possible, to forfeit the value of proposed is consistent with culpability principle. This conclusion is appropriate when compared with the existing decision which judges borrowing money for the transaction determines the confiscation of significant financial benefit. Beyond judicial decision only trapped, concrete solutions thought seriously about are needed considering the purpose and objectives of bribery confiscation.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말

Ⅱ. 뇌물죄의 성립여부

Ⅲ. 실질적 처분권의 이전과 몰수.추징의 대상

Ⅳ. 결 론

키워드

실질적 처분권의 이전 뇌물 몰수 처분 transfer of substantial disposition bribe confiscation collection of the corresponding value