학술논문
일본 금융상품거래법상 특정투자자제도에 관한 고찰
이용수 38
- 영문명
- Thoughts on a Professional Investor System as Adopted by the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 오성근(Sung-Keun O)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제17권 제2호, 361~401쪽, 전체 41쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
7,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act of Korea adopts the so-called professional investor system and defines an investor who is not a professional investor as a “non-professional investor(Provision 6 of Article 9)”. This approach of dividing investors into different groups to regulate capital markets is not unique to the Korean system. Similar approaches have already been taken by the EU's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), Britain's Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) and Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Law. In efforts to better regulate financial markets and better protect individual investors, the EU's MiFID and Britain's COBS even divide investors into three separate groups - retail clients, professional clients and eligible counterparties. But this approach of trisecting investors makes it rather difficult for any one to compare these systems to the Korean system in such subjects as scope of professional investor and regulations on conduct of business, simply because the Korean law divides investors into only two groups. Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Law, however, employs the same “dichotomy” concept of distinguishing investors as the Korean system since it divides them into two groups - professional investor and general investor. It is from this context that this study mainly focuses on examining the similarities in and differences between the Japanese law and the Korean law, although the EU's MiFID and Britain's COBS are also briefly discussed in further discussion. Part II reviews the background and purpose for introducing the professional investor system as well as similar concepts and scope. Part III lists types of investor status conversion, conditions and requirements for each type of conversion including cases where an investor can change his or her investor status or vice versa, conversion procedures, term of validity and effects of conversion. Part IV analyzes the conduct of business regulations with respect to areas of application
and exemption, exemptions from duty of report/disclosure and civil liabilities, regulations on general investment solicitation of acquiring securities, and regulations called for due to the opening of the market exclusively for professionals. And the final part of the study looks at the similarities in and differences between Korea's Financial Investment Services and Capital Market Act and the EU's MiFID.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 도입배경ㆍ취지, 유사개념 및 범위
Ⅲ. 특정투자자의 전환 및 절차 등
Ⅳ. 행위규제 등
Ⅴ. 맺음말
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 회사기회유용의 적용요건과 입법에 대한 검토
- 중국 불법행위법의 최근동향에 관한 연구
- 일본 금융상품거래법상 특정투자자제도에 관한 고찰
- 한국의 전문변호사제도에 대한 소고
- 상표법상 증명표장에 의한 지리적 표시의 보호 고찰
- 1980 국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약(CISG)의 해석과 적용
- A Study on the United States Trustees and Bankruptcy Administrators Programs and a Look at the Korean Bankruptcy Administration System with a View to Establishing an Analogous Program
- 개정 미국통일상법전(UCC) 제2편(물품매매)의 비교법적 고찰
- 예금채권에 대한 신탁법의 적용과 문제점
- 無權代理人의 責任範圍
- 주식회사의 감사에 관한 2009년 개정상법의 문제점 검토
- 전후 국가배상책임에 관한 국제사법적 고찰
- 프랑스의 완전양자제도
- 스톡옵션의 인센티브효과에 관한 고찰
- 금융지주회사와 기업지배구조에 관한 법적 고찰
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!