학술논문
베케트와 데리다 - 잃어버린 침묵을 찾아서
이용수 482
- 영문명
- Beckett and Derrida: In Search of the Lost Silence
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- 김보현(Bohyun Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제12권 2호, 85~109쪽, 전체 25쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
5,800원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Derrida briefly comments that he feels so close to Beckett that he cannot even respond to the singularity of Beckett"s idiom, nor deconstruct Beckett"s ‘unnamable’ Cogito. Yet the comparative study in depth on Beckett and Derrida is extremely scarce, and the systematic comparison on their strategic writings to escape the logocentric frame does not even exist.
This paper detects where arises a point of profound affinity and absolute proximity when they both try to render in their writings the silence assumed as being lost in the logocentric discourses and binary system. For this task, the present paper proceeds as follows: first, Beckett and Derrida have a double attitude toward language. Second, taking their such stances as a point of departure and the basis of this paper, it addresses that both Beckett and Derrida use the language and the binary opposition only to erase them. Third, they both turn to the style and the rhythm of their singular languages in order to evade the grid of binary oppositions, in turn outwitting and casting aside all the conceptual frames. Fourth, they both do the infinite word-play, mingling with a verbal buffoonery, in order to dismantle the meaning generated and protected by the binary structure. Such "linguistic potlatch" is not the kind of word-play that the New Critics once cherished and practiced. Quite the contrary, it jolts and destablizes the polysemy couched in the semantic frame. Lastly the silence that both Beckett and Derrida opt for is still a different language, or a different verbal art, gained after a rigorous and subtle play against the logocentric language in the quardrilateral space, that is, in the grid of language. Beckett once again with his legendary humility describes the silence he tries to tease into his writing as a "pell-mell babel of silence" "which is not silence." Then such silence is not, of course, the "phenomenologial voice" that Husserl and many other major philosophers seek after so desperately, nor, despite the strong temptations and many daring attempts by the critics, the kind of a silence presupposed by the various oriental sages, associated with the pre-Cogito or pre-expressive Cogito completely immune from language.
This paper detects where arises a point of profound affinity and absolute proximity when they both try to render in their writings the silence assumed as being lost in the logocentric discourses and binary system. For this task, the present paper proceeds as follows: first, Beckett and Derrida have a double attitude toward language. Second, taking their such stances as a point of departure and the basis of this paper, it addresses that both Beckett and Derrida use the language and the binary opposition only to erase them. Third, they both turn to the style and the rhythm of their singular languages in order to evade the grid of binary oppositions, in turn outwitting and casting aside all the conceptual frames. Fourth, they both do the infinite word-play, mingling with a verbal buffoonery, in order to dismantle the meaning generated and protected by the binary structure. Such "linguistic potlatch" is not the kind of word-play that the New Critics once cherished and practiced. Quite the contrary, it jolts and destablizes the polysemy couched in the semantic frame. Lastly the silence that both Beckett and Derrida opt for is still a different language, or a different verbal art, gained after a rigorous and subtle play against the logocentric language in the quardrilateral space, that is, in the grid of language. Beckett once again with his legendary humility describes the silence he tries to tease into his writing as a "pell-mell babel of silence" "which is not silence." Then such silence is not, of course, the "phenomenologial voice" that Husserl and many other major philosophers seek after so desperately, nor, despite the strong temptations and many daring attempts by the critics, the kind of a silence presupposed by the various oriental sages, associated with the pre-Cogito or pre-expressive Cogito completely immune from language.
목차
Ⅰ. 언어에 대한 이중적 태도
Ⅱ. 이원구조 비워내기
Ⅲ. 0점의 글쓰기―무의미의 리듬
Ⅳ. 단어 굴리기
Ⅴ. 허구(차연) 속의 침묵
인용문헌
Abstract
Ⅱ. 이원구조 비워내기
Ⅲ. 0점의 글쓰기―무의미의 리듬
Ⅳ. 단어 굴리기
Ⅴ. 허구(차연) 속의 침묵
인용문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- The Emergence of a Novelistic Culture - Modernity and the Perverse Topography of Narrative Desire
- 포스트휴먼 시대에 재배치되는 성과 몸 - 다너 헤러웨이의 공의존적 복수주체
- Female Circumcision - Another Case of Monolithizing the Subaltern?
- Literary Works and Theories As Interweaving
- Bakhtin and Derrida, the Possibility of Dialogue - Towards an Aesthetic of the Eye, Feeling, and Fluid Writing
- Historicized Renaissance and Critical Models - Towards a Methodology of Negotiation
- “포스트페미니즘” 시대의 페미니즘 비평 - 보편성과 여성, 그리고 문학
- 데리다의 은유론 - 명사중심주의와 태양중심주의의 해체
- 거울과 창문 - 벨라스케스의 『궁정의 시녀들』에 대한 푸코와 라캉의 주체와 재현 이론
- 이론의 탈정치화와 문학연구의 가능성
- 베케트와 데리다 - 잃어버린 침묵을 찾아서
- 아도르노와 베케트 - 『엔드게임』의 미메시스적 계기에 대하여
- 투고 안내 외
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!