학술논문
Historicized Renaissance and Critical Models - Towards a Methodology of Negotiation
이용수 36
- 영문명
- Historicized Renaissance and Critical Models
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- Taekyeong Kang
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제12권 2호, 247~277쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Traversing some representative works of New Historicism, Cultural Materialism, and Feminism in the field of the English Renaissance studies, this paper investigates the methodological problematic of the historial criticism of 1980s. Apart from their varying ideological penchants and political orientations that have invited a sizable amount of scrutiny for the last two decades, the "new" historical critics of diverse trends and competing quarters turn out to be of a kind within the purview of their methodological assumptions. In brief, the writings of new historical criticism are implicated in a series of binaries, figured most prominently in the so-called "subversion-containment" debate.
The binarism was transferred, on the one hand, from the discipline of the British social history that the literary scholars heavily draw upon for "sources" and "contexts." The social historians have defined the early modern period as "two-class society," in which the rulers and the ruled, elite and popular cultures existed in conflict with each other, as is often replicated in new historicist writings. Along with the bi-partite social structure, a (false) dichotomy of change and continuity, structure and event, past and present that has informed, and remained unresolved in, historical inquiry finds its way into the new historicism as a form of historical writing. Better known, the binarism also derives from key theoretical concepts such as ideology and culture, structure and agency, power and resistance.
As an attempt at breaking through these binary conceptions of history and society, this essay seeks to ground an alternative theoretical premise in Stuart Hall’s re-conceptualization of ideology in terms of its "articulation" that refuses to submit to either absolute containment or total subversion of any ideological (textual) instances. In particular, Hall’s concept of "reading positions," with its emphatic enunciation of "negotiated position," provides a viable methodological problematic in which the contestatory, and often unproductive, oppositions between the American new historicism and the British cultural materialism, and among various camps of feminism, are cancelled out to establish a more productive ground for historical criticism and critical history at once.
The binarism was transferred, on the one hand, from the discipline of the British social history that the literary scholars heavily draw upon for "sources" and "contexts." The social historians have defined the early modern period as "two-class society," in which the rulers and the ruled, elite and popular cultures existed in conflict with each other, as is often replicated in new historicist writings. Along with the bi-partite social structure, a (false) dichotomy of change and continuity, structure and event, past and present that has informed, and remained unresolved in, historical inquiry finds its way into the new historicism as a form of historical writing. Better known, the binarism also derives from key theoretical concepts such as ideology and culture, structure and agency, power and resistance.
As an attempt at breaking through these binary conceptions of history and society, this essay seeks to ground an alternative theoretical premise in Stuart Hall’s re-conceptualization of ideology in terms of its "articulation" that refuses to submit to either absolute containment or total subversion of any ideological (textual) instances. In particular, Hall’s concept of "reading positions," with its emphatic enunciation of "negotiated position," provides a viable methodological problematic in which the contestatory, and often unproductive, oppositions between the American new historicism and the British cultural materialism, and among various camps of feminism, are cancelled out to establish a more productive ground for historical criticism and critical history at once.
목차
Ⅰ. "Unhistorical Critic" and "Uncritical Historian"
Ⅱ. The Binaries and the Emergence of a Third Term
Ⅲ. Re-conceptualizing "Ideology"
Ⅳ. Propositions of Negotiation
Works Cited
Abstract
Ⅱ. The Binaries and the Emergence of a Third Term
Ⅲ. Re-conceptualizing "Ideology"
Ⅳ. Propositions of Negotiation
Works Cited
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- The Emergence of a Novelistic Culture - Modernity and the Perverse Topography of Narrative Desire
- 포스트휴먼 시대에 재배치되는 성과 몸 - 다너 헤러웨이의 공의존적 복수주체
- Female Circumcision - Another Case of Monolithizing the Subaltern?
- Literary Works and Theories As Interweaving
- Bakhtin and Derrida, the Possibility of Dialogue - Towards an Aesthetic of the Eye, Feeling, and Fluid Writing
- Historicized Renaissance and Critical Models - Towards a Methodology of Negotiation
- “포스트페미니즘” 시대의 페미니즘 비평 - 보편성과 여성, 그리고 문학
- 데리다의 은유론 - 명사중심주의와 태양중심주의의 해체
- 거울과 창문 - 벨라스케스의 『궁정의 시녀들』에 대한 푸코와 라캉의 주체와 재현 이론
- 이론의 탈정치화와 문학연구의 가능성
- 베케트와 데리다 - 잃어버린 침묵을 찾아서
- 아도르노와 베케트 - 『엔드게임』의 미메시스적 계기에 대하여
- 투고 안내 외
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!