본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

“포스트페미니즘” 시대의 페미니즘 비평 - 보편성과 여성, 그리고 문학

이용수 1878

영문명
Feminist Criticism in the Age of "Postfeminism": Universality, Women and Literature
발행기관
한국비평이론학회
저자명
정소영(Soyoung Jeong)
간행물 정보
『비평과 이론』제12권 2호, 37~55쪽, 전체 19쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 영어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2007.12.30
5,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  The term "postfeminism" addresses the backlash against feminism which has gathered pace over the past 20 years, and the re-formation of the main issues of feminism from the oppression of women and fights for universal rights to the gender studies and sexuality as well. It is related with the intervention of identity politics, poststructuralism and postcolonialism, which have challenged the idea of "common oppression" of the Woman arguing that the Woman actually stands for the white middle class heterosexual women. For all the proliferation of the differences in terms of race, class, and sexual orientation among feminist discourses, this new paradigm in feminism stops short of rethinking the complicated relationship women and feminism have had with the universality and institutionalization. For what should be revised is not only the notion of "common" oppressive situation and "common" goal, but the very assumption that feminist discourses or any radical perspectives may derive their own justification from "oppression". Virginia Woolf"s Three Guineas helps to reevaluate the feminist objectives and strategies so far and suggests the frame of thinking we still need to grapple with universality. It shows that universality is not simply the question of inclusion and exclusion because there is no escaping the frame of universality even when one is excluded from the universal norm. The deconstruction of universality, therefore, comes only with understanding the way we are inescapably involved with the universality and the law. Woolf emphasizes the personal as the occasion of subverting the universal and associates it with literature. While literature, the institutionless institution as Derrida puts it, should submit to the law to establish itself as such, it is an absolutely singular event which can exercise the legislative power to sidestep existing laws. Likewise sexual difference as subverting universality can be thought of as such a singular event that happens in the gap between the singularity and its repetition or generalization, that is, through iterability.

목차

1. ‘탈’ 혹은 답보상태
2. 페미니즘의 성공, 혹은 실패
3. 보편성과 여성적 차이, 그리고 문학
인용문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정소영(Soyoung Jeong). (2007).“포스트페미니즘” 시대의 페미니즘 비평 - 보편성과 여성, 그리고 문학. 비평과 이론, 12 (2), 37-55

MLA

정소영(Soyoung Jeong). "“포스트페미니즘” 시대의 페미니즘 비평 - 보편성과 여성, 그리고 문학." 비평과 이론, 12.2(2007): 37-55

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제