학술논문
아도르노와 베케트 - 『엔드게임』의 미메시스적 계기에 대하여
이용수 570
- 영문명
- Adorno in Beckett: The Mimetic Moments in Endgame
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- 윤화영(Yoon Hwa-young)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제12권 2호, 111~140쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
What quality of Beckett"s literature made Adorno have an idea to dedicate his entire Aesthetic Theory to Beckett? Earlier on, he also dedicated an extended study of Beckett"s play Endgame to Beckett. This paper tries to solve this enigma through close reading of Adorno"s Aesthetic Theory paying special attention to the concept of mimesis, one of his major aesthetic categories.
For Adorno, all authentic mimesis is that of utopia, Since the nature uncontaminated by nature-domination of instrumental reason does not exist any more, artworks can only point toward the possibility of a nature which "is not yet" by determinate negation of "what actually is", implying determinate criticisms on what is and has been. Artworks can only express this utopian negativity by a configuration of materials which already contain history sedimented within them.
In terms of practical theory of art, the ideal mimesis should pursue the nonsignificative language. Thus, for Adono, the expression of artworks is the non-subjective in the subject, or to put differently, art is the imitation of an objective expression remote from (subjective) psychology. Seen in this way Beckett"s Endgame does not copy any specific individual nor any specific historical event. The play conveys through expression what caused the decline and catastrophe of history and subject and yet, it does this not through the meaning of their dialogues. Rather, it acquires objectivity through non-discursive means such as regressive language, stage images and historical allegories. This kind of nonrepresentational affinities to the objective reality are dramatized and portrayed through the clownish subjects-characters who are not subjects-individuals but "the protohistory of subjectivity." Although Endgame is historically mediated, the expression, or the spirit that has guided the formal procedure of the construction, is far removed from the one that has inspired the official realism(Lukacs) or didactic literature(Brecht). The abstract quality of Beckettian mimesis proves the workings of material imagination of the author as well as an assimilation to the spell of objective reality which in their immediacy fail to articulate the essential(the truth content).
For Adorno, all authentic mimesis is that of utopia, Since the nature uncontaminated by nature-domination of instrumental reason does not exist any more, artworks can only point toward the possibility of a nature which "is not yet" by determinate negation of "what actually is", implying determinate criticisms on what is and has been. Artworks can only express this utopian negativity by a configuration of materials which already contain history sedimented within them.
In terms of practical theory of art, the ideal mimesis should pursue the nonsignificative language. Thus, for Adono, the expression of artworks is the non-subjective in the subject, or to put differently, art is the imitation of an objective expression remote from (subjective) psychology. Seen in this way Beckett"s Endgame does not copy any specific individual nor any specific historical event. The play conveys through expression what caused the decline and catastrophe of history and subject and yet, it does this not through the meaning of their dialogues. Rather, it acquires objectivity through non-discursive means such as regressive language, stage images and historical allegories. This kind of nonrepresentational affinities to the objective reality are dramatized and portrayed through the clownish subjects-characters who are not subjects-individuals but "the protohistory of subjectivity." Although Endgame is historically mediated, the expression, or the spirit that has guided the formal procedure of the construction, is far removed from the one that has inspired the official realism(Lukacs) or didactic literature(Brecht). The abstract quality of Beckettian mimesis proves the workings of material imagination of the author as well as an assimilation to the spell of objective reality which in their immediacy fail to articulate the essential(the truth content).
목차
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- The Emergence of a Novelistic Culture - Modernity and the Perverse Topography of Narrative Desire
- 포스트휴먼 시대에 재배치되는 성과 몸 - 다너 헤러웨이의 공의존적 복수주체
- Female Circumcision - Another Case of Monolithizing the Subaltern?
- Literary Works and Theories As Interweaving
- Bakhtin and Derrida, the Possibility of Dialogue - Towards an Aesthetic of the Eye, Feeling, and Fluid Writing
- Historicized Renaissance and Critical Models - Towards a Methodology of Negotiation
- “포스트페미니즘” 시대의 페미니즘 비평 - 보편성과 여성, 그리고 문학
- 데리다의 은유론 - 명사중심주의와 태양중심주의의 해체
- 거울과 창문 - 벨라스케스의 『궁정의 시녀들』에 대한 푸코와 라캉의 주체와 재현 이론
- 이론의 탈정치화와 문학연구의 가능성
- 베케트와 데리다 - 잃어버린 침묵을 찾아서
- 아도르노와 베케트 - 『엔드게임』의 미메시스적 계기에 대하여
- 투고 안내 외
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!