학술논문
性徹스님 理解를 위한 考察 - 그 분의 面貌를 어떻게 西洋에 소개할 것인가?
이용수 167
- 영문명
- A Study for the Understanding of T'oeong Sŏngch'ŏl(1912-1993) - How Should He Be Introduced to the Western World? -
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 서명원(S? My?ng-W?n)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제17호, 33~54쪽, 전체 22쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.08.30
5,440원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
S?ngch"?l ranks among the most outstanding monks of the 20th century. He served as meditation master of the famous Haein Monastery (1967-1993) for twenty-six years, including twelve years (1981-1993) as Patriarch of the Chogyejong, by far the largest Korean Buddhist order. But his place in Korean Buddhist history is not without controversy, particularly his utter rejection of the then well-established “sudden-gradual” doctrine of awakening and practice advocated by Master Chinul (1158-1210). The effort to replace it with his own “sudden-sudden” doctrine has so alienated the vast majority of Korean Buddhist scholars that it is difficult to find balanced accounts of S?ngch"?l"s significance in histories of contemporary Korean Buddhism.
In the first part of this paper, I use a dialectical approach, based on the Buddha"s doctrine of the middle path, to address seven of the most common misunderstandings regarding S?ngch"?l"s life and thought. My argument is that S?ngch"?l" must be seen not as an academic, but as a religious figure who dedicated his life to the practice of meditation.
The second part examines both the doctrinal and the socio-political background of S?ngch"?l"s rise. Here I argue that the roots of S?ngch"?l"s sudden-sudden teaching were more religious than academic. The teaching arose not from an objective re-interpretation of Chinul, but from the need to reform the Korean Buddhist tradition that was in a deep state of disarray after several centuries of decay. The teaching was something of a doctrinal coup d"?tat at the Haein monastery, dating from 1967.
The third part compares the two contending paradigms in the Korean “sudden-gradual” controversy, suggesting that the differences are more of emphasis than substance. Chinul devotes more attention to the process leading to awakening, while S?ngch"?l focuses more on the awakening itself. Nevertheless, since S?ngch"?l also includes the four stage process to full enlightenment, one cannot suggest the two paradigms are diametrically opposed.
Since S?ngch"?l"s thought can only be understood within its religious and socio-political context, the introduction of his thought to the West must include a careful review of that historical context. Authoritarian, doctrinal approaches of understanding have lost favor in Korea in the process of democratization over nearly two decades. Koreans and their counterparts in the West tend to prefer a more dialogical approach to the truth, rather than the absolute approach developed by S?ngch"?l. It has now been a long time since Thich Nhat Hanh and the Dalai Lama, the most successful Asian Buddhist in the West and in the world, have understood that fact and put it in practice.
In the first part of this paper, I use a dialectical approach, based on the Buddha"s doctrine of the middle path, to address seven of the most common misunderstandings regarding S?ngch"?l"s life and thought. My argument is that S?ngch"?l" must be seen not as an academic, but as a religious figure who dedicated his life to the practice of meditation.
The second part examines both the doctrinal and the socio-political background of S?ngch"?l"s rise. Here I argue that the roots of S?ngch"?l"s sudden-sudden teaching were more religious than academic. The teaching arose not from an objective re-interpretation of Chinul, but from the need to reform the Korean Buddhist tradition that was in a deep state of disarray after several centuries of decay. The teaching was something of a doctrinal coup d"?tat at the Haein monastery, dating from 1967.
The third part compares the two contending paradigms in the Korean “sudden-gradual” controversy, suggesting that the differences are more of emphasis than substance. Chinul devotes more attention to the process leading to awakening, while S?ngch"?l focuses more on the awakening itself. Nevertheless, since S?ngch"?l also includes the four stage process to full enlightenment, one cannot suggest the two paradigms are diametrically opposed.
Since S?ngch"?l"s thought can only be understood within its religious and socio-political context, the introduction of his thought to the West must include a careful review of that historical context. Authoritarian, doctrinal approaches of understanding have lost favor in Korea in the process of democratization over nearly two decades. Koreans and their counterparts in the West tend to prefer a more dialogical approach to the truth, rather than the absolute approach developed by S?ngch"?l. It has now been a long time since Thich Nhat Hanh and the Dalai Lama, the most successful Asian Buddhist in the West and in the world, have understood that fact and put it in practice.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 성철에 대한 몇 가지 誤解의 拂拭
Ⅲ. 성철의 등장 意義
Ⅳ. 頓悟頓修에 對한 考察
Ⅴ. 맺음말
영문초록
Ⅱ. 성철에 대한 몇 가지 誤解의 拂拭
Ⅲ. 성철의 등장 意義
Ⅳ. 頓悟頓修에 對한 考察
Ⅴ. 맺음말
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 大乘起信論을 통해 본 法性偈(華嚴一乘法界圖) 연구
- 민국시기 불교사 연구에서 보이는 청대 고증학 전통과 서구사상의 영향
- 불교학연구회 활동일지 외
- 高麗時代 海東佛敎 典籍의 中國 流通에 대하여
- 삼론가의 호칭과 승랑의 고유사상
- 『華嚴宗一乘開心論』의 사상적 특질
- 백용성의 대각교의 근대성에 대한 소고 - 마음[覺]을 중심으로
- 『지관대의』에 나타난 담연 사상의 특색
- 性徹스님 理解를 위한 考察 - 그 분의 面貌를 어떻게 西洋에 소개할 것인가?
- Kailas山의 須彌山說에 관한 종합적 고찰
- 종색선사『좌선의』의 하타요가적 고찰
- 불을 보는 두 시선 - 헤겔의 통일 논리와 용수의 해체 논리
- ‘열린’ 가족 담론에 대한 불교적 검토
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!