학술논문
카르텔로 인한 손해액의 산정 - 이론과 실제
이용수 208
- 영문명
- Calculation of Damages Caused by Cartel: Theory and Practice
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 홍대식(Dae-Sik Hong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제14권 제3호(하), 1101~1136쪽, 전체 36쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.09.30
7,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The compensation for damages caused by cartel requires a difficult process for legal practitioners to calculate damages as accurate as possible based on victim’s loss. This process can be carried out with economists’ assistance to be done in the form of economic analysis which will be assessed under the legal framework. To what extent the court will request for evidentiary accuracy of damages and by which standards it will assess economic evidence presented by the parties would be the key to whether damages action against cartel are likely to be activated.
Typically the measure of harm in a cartel damages case is taken to be the difference between the price actually paid for and the competitive price but for the infringement. According to this “difference theory”, the competitive price should be estimated as comparison with the actual price. It is the price that would have been formed in the absence of the cartel. It can be proved by direct evidence in very rare cases, but in most cases the analysis requires the application of economic skills by which “but for” price, that is hypothetical competitive price may be illustrated with reference to a specific cartel case. For those methods which have been identified for calculating overcharges there are the “before-and-after” method, the yardstick or benchmarking method, the cost-based approach, theoretical modelling method and econometric modelling method. When defendants facing compensation for damages are also subject to imposition of administrative fine, adjustment system is needed to avoid probable overdeterrence in a way of taking compensatory payments into consideration during calculating administrative fine. The recent judgment of the Seoul central district court regarding damages claim lawsuit against cartel in the auction market for supply of oil to the military involving 5 oil refining companies provides with an interesting material for a case study to several legal issues addressed in this paper.
Typically the measure of harm in a cartel damages case is taken to be the difference between the price actually paid for and the competitive price but for the infringement. According to this “difference theory”, the competitive price should be estimated as comparison with the actual price. It is the price that would have been formed in the absence of the cartel. It can be proved by direct evidence in very rare cases, but in most cases the analysis requires the application of economic skills by which “but for” price, that is hypothetical competitive price may be illustrated with reference to a specific cartel case. For those methods which have been identified for calculating overcharges there are the “before-and-after” method, the yardstick or benchmarking method, the cost-based approach, theoretical modelling method and econometric modelling method. When defendants facing compensation for damages are also subject to imposition of administrative fine, adjustment system is needed to avoid probable overdeterrence in a way of taking compensatory payments into consideration during calculating administrative fine. The recent judgment of the Seoul central district court regarding damages claim lawsuit against cartel in the auction market for supply of oil to the military involving 5 oil refining companies provides with an interesting material for a case study to several legal issues addressed in this paper.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 카르텔로 인한 손해의 의미와 손해액 입증
Ⅲ. 카르텔로 인한 손해액 산정방법
Ⅳ. 손해액과 과징금의 관계
Ⅴ. 사례연구: 5개 정유사 군납유류 입찰담합 손해배상 사건
Ⅵ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. 카르텔로 인한 손해의 의미와 손해액 입증
Ⅲ. 카르텔로 인한 손해액 산정방법
Ⅳ. 손해액과 과징금의 관계
Ⅴ. 사례연구: 5개 정유사 군납유류 입찰담합 손해배상 사건
Ⅵ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 증권거래법 제186조 제1항에 관한 연구
- 증권규제에서 Materiality에 대한 小考
- 株主의 總會召集請求權에 관한 商法規定의 改編方案 - 株主主導的 總會召集權과 그 濫用防止의 均衡 摸索
- 공정거래법의 목적 - 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로
- 학회활동 현황(2007.7.1 - 2007.9.30) 외
- 신탁제도의 발전을 위한 입법과제 - 집단신탁을 중심으로
- 特許制度와 倫理의 調和
- 카르텔로 인한 손해액의 산정 - 이론과 실제
- 證券對替決濟制度上 集中當事者의 物權法的 地位
- 재판상 자백의 성립요건으로서의 자백의 대상 - 간접사실ㆍ보조사실의 자백을 중심으로
- 소프트웨어 特許의 현황과 과제
- 최근 미국판례상 내부자거래 요건의 동향 - 연방 제 11순회구고등법원판결(SEC v. Yun)과 관련하여
- 자산유동화와 진정한 매매의 법리
- 새로운 기업형태의 도입에 관한 법적 고찰
- 미국법상 해고자유원칙에 관한 학설의 입장과 META를 통한 검토
- 刊行辭
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!