공정거래법의 목적 - 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로

• 영문명: The Goals and Objectives of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act: with Special Emphasis upon Comparative Analysis
• 발행기관: 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
• 저자명: 이기종(Ki Jong Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『비교사법』比較私法 제14권 제3호(하), 1079~1100쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.09.30

영문 초록

  Sec. 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (MRFTA) lists various and somewhat conflicting goals and objectives, and thus triggers disputes on its interpretation and modification. However, the MRFTA is not the only legislation that suffers from conflicting goals and objectives. The antitrust laws of the USA and the competition law of EU have experienced similar courses of controversy. And recent reports of ABA and ICN show that nations pursue a variety of goals and objectives through their competition laws. After surveying the goals and objectives of competition laws of nations, this article draws out some lessons for the MRFTA. On a gradual basis, it should place a greater weight on efficiencies and consumer welfare rather than other economic, social and political objectives. But it would be neither possible nor desirable for the MRFTA to adopt a competition policy which solely focuses on efficiencies and consumer welfare like that of the USA, as the social, political and economic background of both countries are widely different.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 비교법적 고찰
Ⅲ. 우리 공정거래법의 목적
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]

키워드

경쟁법의 목적 경쟁의 촉진 경제적 효율 소비자후생 중소기업의 보호 Goals and Objectives of Competition Laws Promotion of Competition Efficiencies Consumer Welfare Protection of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises