학술논문
새로운 기업형태의 도입에 관한 법적 고찰
이용수 60
- 영문명
- A Legal Study on the Introduction of New Business Association Types
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 김재문(Jae-Moon Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제14권 제3호(하), 853~892쪽, 전체 40쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.09.30
7,600원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The background of popularity of LLC’s and LLP’s in the U.S. and their recent adoption in Japan is that they enable owners to manage the business themselves and to still enjoy the limited liability privileges and get pass-through taxation treatment like in partnerships.
Recent Amendment Bill of the Korean Commercial Code in regard of new business association type introduction, as prepared by the Ministry of Justice, has concluded to adopt an LP as a Commercial Code partnership type and an LLP as a hybrid limited liability business entity.
However, the Korean new LP as defined in the Amendment Bill has a demerit that it can not give the limited liability privileges to managing partners even with respect to partnership matters that were not done or supervised by themselves. Also the new LLP type as defined in the Amendment Bill has a demerit that it can not enable a single taxation treatment under the current Korean tax rules.
However, fortunately there is a recent movement to adopt the U.S. type partnership taxation system by the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
If that comes realized, it is probable that the new LLC type will become the most attractive business association type among small-sized close business associations in that it gives management flexibility as agreed among members of the LLC and still has privileges of both limited liability and single taxation.
I think adoption of LLP’s instead of LP’s should have been done in that LLP’s give limited liability privileges even to managing partners.
Regarding close corporations, I think it is necessary to do a separate close corporation legislation that has detailed default rules which business owners can rely upon when they are not willing to spend a lot of money to lawyers and accountants to make shareholder agreements in advance.
Recent Amendment Bill of the Korean Commercial Code in regard of new business association type introduction, as prepared by the Ministry of Justice, has concluded to adopt an LP as a Commercial Code partnership type and an LLP as a hybrid limited liability business entity.
However, the Korean new LP as defined in the Amendment Bill has a demerit that it can not give the limited liability privileges to managing partners even with respect to partnership matters that were not done or supervised by themselves. Also the new LLP type as defined in the Amendment Bill has a demerit that it can not enable a single taxation treatment under the current Korean tax rules.
However, fortunately there is a recent movement to adopt the U.S. type partnership taxation system by the Ministry of Finance and Economy.
If that comes realized, it is probable that the new LLC type will become the most attractive business association type among small-sized close business associations in that it gives management flexibility as agreed among members of the LLC and still has privileges of both limited liability and single taxation.
I think adoption of LLP’s instead of LP’s should have been done in that LLP’s give limited liability privileges even to managing partners.
Regarding close corporations, I think it is necessary to do a separate close corporation legislation that has detailed default rules which business owners can rely upon when they are not willing to spend a lot of money to lawyers and accountants to make shareholder agreements in advance.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 미국에서의 새로운 기업형태
Ⅲ. 미국에서의 소규모 폐쇄적인 주식회사에 대한 움직임
Ⅳ. 일본에서의 기업형태와 관련된 움직임
Ⅴ. 우리나라에서 새로운 기업형태와 관련한 가능한 방안들과 이번 법무부 상법개정안에 대한 생각
Ⅵ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. 미국에서의 새로운 기업형태
Ⅲ. 미국에서의 소규모 폐쇄적인 주식회사에 대한 움직임
Ⅳ. 일본에서의 기업형태와 관련된 움직임
Ⅴ. 우리나라에서 새로운 기업형태와 관련한 가능한 방안들과 이번 법무부 상법개정안에 대한 생각
Ⅵ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 증권거래법 제186조 제1항에 관한 연구
- 증권규제에서 Materiality에 대한 小考
- 株主의 總會召集請求權에 관한 商法規定의 改編方案 - 株主主導的 總會召集權과 그 濫用防止의 均衡 摸索
- 공정거래법의 목적 - 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로
- 학회활동 현황(2007.7.1 - 2007.9.30) 외
- 신탁제도의 발전을 위한 입법과제 - 집단신탁을 중심으로
- 特許制度와 倫理의 調和
- 카르텔로 인한 손해액의 산정 - 이론과 실제
- 證券對替決濟制度上 集中當事者의 物權法的 地位
- 재판상 자백의 성립요건으로서의 자백의 대상 - 간접사실ㆍ보조사실의 자백을 중심으로
- 소프트웨어 特許의 현황과 과제
- 최근 미국판례상 내부자거래 요건의 동향 - 연방 제 11순회구고등법원판결(SEC v. Yun)과 관련하여
- 자산유동화와 진정한 매매의 법리
- 새로운 기업형태의 도입에 관한 법적 고찰
- 미국법상 해고자유원칙에 관한 학설의 입장과 META를 통한 검토
- 刊行辭
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!