학술논문
株主의 總會召集請求權에 관한 商法規定의 改編方案 - 株主主導的 總會召集權과 그 濫用防止의 均衡 摸索
이용수 68
- 영문명
- Some Legal Points on Shareholders’ Right to Call General Meetings - Attempts to Find a More Appropriate Balance between the Shareholders-initiated Right to Convene General Meetings and the Prevention of the Abuse thereof -
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 金性倬(Seong-Tak Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제14권 제3호(하), 807~851쪽, 전체 45쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.09.30
8,200원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this study is to review the current system of the shareholders’ right to call general meetings and to suggest some reform solutions for facilitating and expanding upon the shareholders’ right to call general meetings as well as preventing the abuse of the right.
Korean legislation concerning the shareholders’ right to call general meetings, which adopts the ‘step by step’ method rather than entitling shareholders to call general meetings directly, is more restrictive, compared to the relevant system of UK, Australia, and USA. Korean Commercial Act section 366 provides that ⑴ shareholders who hold no less than 3% of total issued and outstanding shares may demand the convocation of an extraordinary general meeting, by filing with the board of directors a written statements of the proposed subject-matters of the meeting together with the reasons for the proposed convocation; if the steps ⑵ for the convocation of a general meeting are not taken promptly after the demand for convocation by minority shareholders, the shareholder who made such demand may convene such meeting with the permission of the court.
In this paper, I suggest the followings: in addition to having the power to ⑴ request the directors to call a general meeting, shareholders holding at least 5% or 10% of the voting shares may also call a general meeting themselves; some ⑵ supplementary legislations such as shareholders’ right to ask the company for the reasonable expenses the shareholders incurred because the directors failed to call and arrange to hold the meeting, etc., are necessary for securing the effectiveness of the system; a corporation’s constitution may allow a smaller holdings to ⑶ request a meeting than under 3% of the voting shares.
Korean legislation concerning the shareholders’ right to call general meetings, which adopts the ‘step by step’ method rather than entitling shareholders to call general meetings directly, is more restrictive, compared to the relevant system of UK, Australia, and USA. Korean Commercial Act section 366 provides that ⑴ shareholders who hold no less than 3% of total issued and outstanding shares may demand the convocation of an extraordinary general meeting, by filing with the board of directors a written statements of the proposed subject-matters of the meeting together with the reasons for the proposed convocation; if the steps ⑵ for the convocation of a general meeting are not taken promptly after the demand for convocation by minority shareholders, the shareholder who made such demand may convene such meeting with the permission of the court.
In this paper, I suggest the followings: in addition to having the power to ⑴ request the directors to call a general meeting, shareholders holding at least 5% or 10% of the voting shares may also call a general meeting themselves; some ⑵ supplementary legislations such as shareholders’ right to ask the company for the reasonable expenses the shareholders incurred because the directors failed to call and arrange to hold the meeting, etc., are necessary for securing the effectiveness of the system; a corporation’s constitution may allow a smaller holdings to ⑶ request a meeting than under 3% of the voting shares.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 株主의 總會召集權에 관한 制度設計의 基礎
Ⅲ. 總會召集에 관한 立法類型
Ⅳ. 總會召集의 適格性 및 正當性
Ⅴ. 總會召集의 節次要件
Ⅵ. 總會召集에 관한 商法規定의 適用排除 또는 加重ㆍ緩和
Ⅶ. 맺음말 및 立法的 提言
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. 株主의 總會召集權에 관한 制度設計의 基礎
Ⅲ. 總會召集에 관한 立法類型
Ⅳ. 總會召集의 適格性 및 正當性
Ⅴ. 總會召集의 節次要件
Ⅵ. 總會召集에 관한 商法規定의 適用排除 또는 加重ㆍ緩和
Ⅶ. 맺음말 및 立法的 提言
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
키워드
주주총회의 소집
총회소집권자
이사회
소수주주
3%의 지주비율
6개월간 주식보유기간
법원의 총회소집허가
총회소집의 정당성
주주제안
Calling the General Meeting
Persons Entitled to Call Shareholder Meetings
Shareholders’ Right to Requisition a Meeting
Failure of Directors to Call General Meeting
Shareholders’ Direct Right to Convene a Meeting
Court-permitted Meeting
Shareholder Proposals
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 증권거래법 제186조 제1항에 관한 연구
- 증권규제에서 Materiality에 대한 小考
- 株主의 總會召集請求權에 관한 商法規定의 改編方案 - 株主主導的 總會召集權과 그 濫用防止의 均衡 摸索
- 공정거래법의 목적 - 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로
- 학회활동 현황(2007.7.1 - 2007.9.30) 외
- 신탁제도의 발전을 위한 입법과제 - 집단신탁을 중심으로
- 特許制度와 倫理의 調和
- 카르텔로 인한 손해액의 산정 - 이론과 실제
- 證券對替決濟制度上 集中當事者의 物權法的 地位
- 재판상 자백의 성립요건으로서의 자백의 대상 - 간접사실ㆍ보조사실의 자백을 중심으로
- 소프트웨어 特許의 현황과 과제
- 최근 미국판례상 내부자거래 요건의 동향 - 연방 제 11순회구고등법원판결(SEC v. Yun)과 관련하여
- 자산유동화와 진정한 매매의 법리
- 새로운 기업형태의 도입에 관한 법적 고찰
- 미국법상 해고자유원칙에 관한 학설의 입장과 META를 통한 검토
- 刊行辭
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!