학술논문
언론개혁에 관한 헌법학적 연구
이용수 322
- 영문명
- A Constitutional Study on the Press Reform
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 황성기(Sung Gi-Hwang)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第13卷 第3號(第2冊), 613~661쪽, 전체 49쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.09.30
8,680원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study is a kind of drawing a boundary around the state"s authority to regulate the press. The position of the boundary reflects a balance of two conflicting interests - the value of free expression v. the interests advanced by the state to support regulation. Especially, this study inquires whether the state might have a role in furthering the democratic mission of the press, and whether the state might have more of a role to play in regulating the press than had been previously allowed.
The proponents of press reform in Korea have broached the subject of media reform, especially after the political democratization of Korean society in 1987. Traditionally the legal theories surrounding the freedom of expression and the corporate media system have been supported by several dogmas or myths. To solve the problems of Korean free market of ideas, the Act on Protection of Freedom and Function of the Press was enacted in 2005. 1. This study analyzes the Act in three parts as follows.
Firstly, this study analyzes the constitutionality of the means to deal with media concentration to preserve the viewpoints diversity in Korean free market of ideas. The state is able to enhance ‘the robustness of public debate’ by its own powers of regulation. In this context, the means to deal with media concentration of the Act should be supported.
Secondly, this study analyzes the constitutionality of the provisions of constituting an editing committee which is entitled to make decisions of content trend in the newspaper. For this, this study inquires the concept ‘Function of the Press’ of §21③ of Korean Constitution in the perspective of the revision of Korean Constitution. I believe that the concept ‘Function of the Press’ of §21③ means the editorial freedom. In this context, the provisions of constituting an editing committee to preserve the editorial freedom should be supported.
Thirdly, this study analyzes the constitutionality of mono-medium ownership regulation which was not adopted in the Act. This part presents a subject difficult of solution in the context of protection of individual properties. But I believe that the mono-medium ownership regulation mechanism is needed.
The autonomy protected by the freedom of expression and enjoyed by individuals and the press is not an end in itself, but is rather a means to further the democratic values underlying our Constitution. Finally, the state may be an oppressor, but it may also be a source of freedom.
The proponents of press reform in Korea have broached the subject of media reform, especially after the political democratization of Korean society in 1987. Traditionally the legal theories surrounding the freedom of expression and the corporate media system have been supported by several dogmas or myths. To solve the problems of Korean free market of ideas, the Act on Protection of Freedom and Function of the Press was enacted in 2005. 1. This study analyzes the Act in three parts as follows.
Firstly, this study analyzes the constitutionality of the means to deal with media concentration to preserve the viewpoints diversity in Korean free market of ideas. The state is able to enhance ‘the robustness of public debate’ by its own powers of regulation. In this context, the means to deal with media concentration of the Act should be supported.
Secondly, this study analyzes the constitutionality of the provisions of constituting an editing committee which is entitled to make decisions of content trend in the newspaper. For this, this study inquires the concept ‘Function of the Press’ of §21③ of Korean Constitution in the perspective of the revision of Korean Constitution. I believe that the concept ‘Function of the Press’ of §21③ means the editorial freedom. In this context, the provisions of constituting an editing committee to preserve the editorial freedom should be supported.
Thirdly, this study analyzes the constitutionality of mono-medium ownership regulation which was not adopted in the Act. This part presents a subject difficult of solution in the context of protection of individual properties. But I believe that the mono-medium ownership regulation mechanism is needed.
The autonomy protected by the freedom of expression and enjoyed by individuals and the press is not an end in itself, but is rather a means to further the democratic values underlying our Constitution. Finally, the state may be an oppressor, but it may also be a source of freedom.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 언론개혁의 대상범위
Ⅲ. 언론개혁의 헌법이론적 문제점
Ⅳ. 언론개혁을 둘러싼 쟁점과 헌법적합성
Ⅴ. 나오는 말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 언론개혁의 대상범위
Ⅲ. 언론개혁의 헌법이론적 문제점
Ⅳ. 언론개혁을 둘러싼 쟁점과 헌법적합성
Ⅴ. 나오는 말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 國民代表關係의 法的 性格
- 원리모델에 의한 사회적 기본권 침해여부의 판단기준 및 심사구조
- 언론의 자유와 통신비밀 - ‘안기부 X파일’ 사건과 미국연방대법원 판례와의 비교를 중심으로
- 현행 헌법상 기본권 체계 및 범위에 관한 일고찰
- 유럽을 위한 헌법원리들
- 우선변제제도와 재산권 보호의 함수관계 - 헌재결 2006. 11. 30. 2003헌가14ㆍ15(병합)를 중심으로
- 落胎節次規制의 違憲性與否에 관한 硏究 - 美 聯邦大法院 判例를 中心으로
- 대입3불정책의 헌법적 문제점
- 大統領의 有故의 憲法問題 - 한국과 프랑스의 논의를 중심으로
- 지방분권시대에 있어서 새로운 조례 유형에 대한 헌법적 분석 - 일본의 분권개혁을 중심으로
- 革新都市最終立地選定公表行爲에 대한 憲法訴願決定에 관한 小考 - 헌재결 2006. 12. 28, 2006헌마312
- 언론개혁에 관한 헌법학적 연구
- 社團法人 韓國憲法學會 定款 외
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!