학술논문
현행 헌법상 기본권 체계 및 범위에 관한 일고찰
이용수 339
- 영문명
- A Study on the System of the Fundamental Human Rights
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 한상운(Han Sang-Woon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第13卷 第3號(第2冊), 501~537쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.09.30
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Respecting the fundamental human right is the core notion of the constitution. Contractions and methodologies of respecting the human rights vary by each county. It is not deniable that constitutional laws, which clearly provide fundamental human rights, are more effectively protecting fundamental human rights than the one that is not provided. Although examples of the British and the USA constitutional laws can challenge this line of claim, it is widely accepted by Korean academia of constitutional law"s theories and precedents that defined fundamental human rights in the constitutional law would have more clear debates such as contents and limitation of fundamental human rights.
The fact that the limitation of the fundamental human rights, which could be or must be guaranteed by constitutional law, cannot be extended infinitely and it is not necessary. (This can be supported by the openness and incompleteness of the constitution). Therefore, it can be satisfied by indicating provisions of fundamental human rights in the constitutional law considering fundamental values that the current constitutional law pursuits. In other words, various unwritten rights can be derived by the interpretations based on openness and abstractness of the core of the fundamental human rights.
An issue arises under the current constitutional law that whether the pro-visions of the fundamental human rights meet the system of fundamental human rights. For it, first, prior understanding of the relationship between the systems of the fundamental human rights and ‘Grundrechtstheorie’ is necessary. The definition of Grundrechtstheorie is that it is a systemic view points or theory regarding the general characteristics, regulatory goals and its courses, and contents limitation. Grundrechtssystem, the system of fundamental human rights means the internal system or order that could provide guidance in interpreting general fundamental human rights. Allowing the system of fundamental human rights as a means of understanding the theory of fundamental human rights which is used as a means of understanding fundamental human rights are to prevent national authorities from arbitrative interpretation of human rights, thus to enhance security of the fundamental human rights ultimately. Therefore, the theory and the system of fundamental human rights have been fully supported except the necessary explanation of each of unique values in interpreting individual human rights are remained unproved.
Regarding the system of fundamental human rights under the current constitutional law, the system of the human rights that based on natural rights should be eliminated. It is an appropriate argument that the interpretation of the human rights should be based on constitutional law rather than natural law regarding methodological limitation of the law. Under the current constitution, fundamental human rights could be understood that the constitutional law has characteristic of natural law and the duplicity of the fundamental human rights in interpreting should be fully considered. Current constitutional law constitutes of dignity of human, pursuit of values and happiness, recognition of duplicity of fundamental human rights, respect of liberty and equality, respect of the right to participate in politics and the right of judicial redemption, right of compensation of human welfare, and effect of the human right toward the nation as well as other people. As a result, debates on understanding of each aspects of constitution could be validated by the fact that the openness, uniformity, and limitation in interpretation of the constitution could be secured via reviewing internal relevance among constituent of systems of the human rights. Regarding effect of fundamental human rights, the provisions of the social rights that the internal relevance is difficult to be admitted under the current law should be improve
The fact that the limitation of the fundamental human rights, which could be or must be guaranteed by constitutional law, cannot be extended infinitely and it is not necessary. (This can be supported by the openness and incompleteness of the constitution). Therefore, it can be satisfied by indicating provisions of fundamental human rights in the constitutional law considering fundamental values that the current constitutional law pursuits. In other words, various unwritten rights can be derived by the interpretations based on openness and abstractness of the core of the fundamental human rights.
An issue arises under the current constitutional law that whether the pro-visions of the fundamental human rights meet the system of fundamental human rights. For it, first, prior understanding of the relationship between the systems of the fundamental human rights and ‘Grundrechtstheorie’ is necessary. The definition of Grundrechtstheorie is that it is a systemic view points or theory regarding the general characteristics, regulatory goals and its courses, and contents limitation. Grundrechtssystem, the system of fundamental human rights means the internal system or order that could provide guidance in interpreting general fundamental human rights. Allowing the system of fundamental human rights as a means of understanding the theory of fundamental human rights which is used as a means of understanding fundamental human rights are to prevent national authorities from arbitrative interpretation of human rights, thus to enhance security of the fundamental human rights ultimately. Therefore, the theory and the system of fundamental human rights have been fully supported except the necessary explanation of each of unique values in interpreting individual human rights are remained unproved.
Regarding the system of fundamental human rights under the current constitutional law, the system of the human rights that based on natural rights should be eliminated. It is an appropriate argument that the interpretation of the human rights should be based on constitutional law rather than natural law regarding methodological limitation of the law. Under the current constitution, fundamental human rights could be understood that the constitutional law has characteristic of natural law and the duplicity of the fundamental human rights in interpreting should be fully considered. Current constitutional law constitutes of dignity of human, pursuit of values and happiness, recognition of duplicity of fundamental human rights, respect of liberty and equality, respect of the right to participate in politics and the right of judicial redemption, right of compensation of human welfare, and effect of the human right toward the nation as well as other people. As a result, debates on understanding of each aspects of constitution could be validated by the fact that the openness, uniformity, and limitation in interpretation of the constitution could be secured via reviewing internal relevance among constituent of systems of the human rights. Regarding effect of fundamental human rights, the provisions of the social rights that the internal relevance is difficult to be admitted under the current law should be improve
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기본권이론(Grundrechtstheorie)
Ⅲ. 기본권체계(Grundrechtssystem)에 관한 논의
Ⅳ. 현행 헌법상 기본권체계
Ⅴ. 기본권 보호범위
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 기본권이론(Grundrechtstheorie)
Ⅲ. 기본권체계(Grundrechtssystem)에 관한 논의
Ⅳ. 현행 헌법상 기본권체계
Ⅴ. 기본권 보호범위
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 國民代表關係의 法的 性格
- 원리모델에 의한 사회적 기본권 침해여부의 판단기준 및 심사구조
- 언론의 자유와 통신비밀 - ‘안기부 X파일’ 사건과 미국연방대법원 판례와의 비교를 중심으로
- 현행 헌법상 기본권 체계 및 범위에 관한 일고찰
- 유럽을 위한 헌법원리들
- 우선변제제도와 재산권 보호의 함수관계 - 헌재결 2006. 11. 30. 2003헌가14ㆍ15(병합)를 중심으로
- 落胎節次規制의 違憲性與否에 관한 硏究 - 美 聯邦大法院 判例를 中心으로
- 대입3불정책의 헌법적 문제점
- 大統領의 有故의 憲法問題 - 한국과 프랑스의 논의를 중심으로
- 지방분권시대에 있어서 새로운 조례 유형에 대한 헌법적 분석 - 일본의 분권개혁을 중심으로
- 革新都市最終立地選定公表行爲에 대한 憲法訴願決定에 관한 小考 - 헌재결 2006. 12. 28, 2006헌마312
- 언론개혁에 관한 헌법학적 연구
- 社團法人 韓國憲法學會 定款 외
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!