학술논문
분묘기지권에 관한 소고
이용수 151
- 영문명
- A study on the site right of graveyards
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 김진(Kim Jin)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第24卷 第1號, 95~120쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.06.30
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In old traditional Korean society, they had to make their ancestors" tombs by Confucian ideas and the theories of divination based on topography, but every real estate which could make tombs belonged to only distinguished families and wealthy people those days.
On the other side most common people couldn"t have any lands to build tombs, so they couldn"t help building their ancestor"s tombs on the other"s land. Considered with all things like this, Korean case law has recognized the real rights similar to the surface rights called "the right of grave and graveyard", even though they built their tombs without acceptance about their tombs from owners during 20 years freely.
However it is wondered if Korean case law ought to recognize the right to make tomb without acceptance for 20 years even today.
Especially considering with the law on funeral and the like first, under the item 1 and 3, the article 23, the same law, and the supplementary article 2, in the case of building the tomb without getting acceptance from the owner after coming into effect this rule, the right of grave and its graveyard can"t be recognized any longer today, second, the grave keeper must preserve and serve the tomb for the existing period of the right of grave and its graveyard, but it doesn"t mean he has the right of grave and its graveyard. It can just be seen as restricted for 60 years by the respect of private ownership and the law on funeral and the like.
On the other side most common people couldn"t have any lands to build tombs, so they couldn"t help building their ancestor"s tombs on the other"s land. Considered with all things like this, Korean case law has recognized the real rights similar to the surface rights called "the right of grave and graveyard", even though they built their tombs without acceptance about their tombs from owners during 20 years freely.
However it is wondered if Korean case law ought to recognize the right to make tomb without acceptance for 20 years even today.
Especially considering with the law on funeral and the like first, under the item 1 and 3, the article 23, the same law, and the supplementary article 2, in the case of building the tomb without getting acceptance from the owner after coming into effect this rule, the right of grave and its graveyard can"t be recognized any longer today, second, the grave keeper must preserve and serve the tomb for the existing period of the right of grave and its graveyard, but it doesn"t mean he has the right of grave and its graveyard. It can just be seen as restricted for 60 years by the respect of private ownership and the law on funeral and the like.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 분묘기지권의 의의 및 연혁
Ⅲ. 분묘기지권의 성립과 효력
Ⅳ. 장사 등에 관한 법률과 분묘기지권
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 분묘기지권의 의의 및 연혁
Ⅲ. 분묘기지권의 성립과 효력
Ⅳ. 장사 등에 관한 법률과 분묘기지권
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 附錄 외
- 우리 저작권법 체계상 저작자와 저작권의 귀속문제
- 노동관행의 성립과 효력 - 대판 2001.10.23, 2001다53950
- 종중의 ‘자연발생적 단체설’에 대한 소고
- 등기부취득시효에서 등기의 승계 여부
- 독일에 있어서 해제효과론의 전개
- 중ㆍ고등학교시험문제와 저작권 - 서울중앙지법 2006. 10. 18. 선고, 2005가합73377 판결(항소)
- 분묘기지권에 관한 소고
- 유치권자에 의한 경매신청
- 항공기사고와 불법행위 - 조종사ㆍ관제사과실책임을 중심으로
- 도산기업의 지배구조에 관한 연구
- 교회분열에 따른 재산귀속 - 대법원(전원합의체) 2006. 4. 20. 선고2004다37775 판결
- 대화자 사이의 무체적 의사표시의 효력발생
- 인체생물학적 물질의 이차적 이용과 「Informed Consent」 법리
- 信託受益權의 消滅時效
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!