학술논문
유치권자에 의한 경매신청
이용수 78
- 영문명
- Application of auction by Lien
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 추신영(Choo Sin-Young)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第24卷 第1號, 161~188쪽, 전체 28쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.06.30
6,160원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The possessor of property or securities belonging to another person has any claim arising in respect of such property or securities and if payment of the claim is due, he may retain possession of the property or securities until the claim is satisfied. A lien having a right of retention may sell the property retained at auction in satisfaction of his claim. A lien is a legal mortgage in the Korea Civil Law.
§274 Ⅰ Civil Execution Law is prescribed in practical application in the application of auction of mortgage. Auction of mortgage is recognized at the extinction principle and request of allotment.
But, A majority theory is recognized at application of auction by lien, what is the auction for conversion into money. Therefore, An extinction principle and request of allotment not be recognized. Application of auction by lien is not auction for conversion into money but auction for securityright.
I think, Legal nature of application of auction by lien is application of auction by mortgage. Therefore, Application of auction by lien is recognized the legal effect of attachment, request of allotment and extinction principle.
There is a great difference between application of auction by lien and application of auction for conversion into money. First, Application of auction by lien is revealed in the money of credit. But, Application of auction for conversion into money is not revealed in the money of credit. Second, Korea Civil Law is prescribed at the application of auction for lien. It is trace a parallel between lien and another security interest.
An object of auction is satisfaction of creditors and protection of debtors. Especially, Lien have not registered in the register. So that, Purchaser can not buy at the Real Estate. Therefore, Creditor can not satisfaction and debtor can not puy back what debtor"s owes. For that reason, A lien is that not registered in the register, A lien must become extinct.
A great problem in the lien that was disguise lien. An example, The construction expenses of builder for the remodeling is a subject of lien. Then, Building owner and builder become inflated at the construction expenses. For that reason, Purchaser can not buy at the lien in the building.
The Civil Execution Law not be recognized the request of allotment by another creditors. It is mean that lien appear after a close of auction. This is due to acceptance principle that I insist on the restrictions extinction principle.
§274 Ⅰ Civil Execution Law is prescribed in practical application in the application of auction of mortgage. Auction of mortgage is recognized at the extinction principle and request of allotment.
But, A majority theory is recognized at application of auction by lien, what is the auction for conversion into money. Therefore, An extinction principle and request of allotment not be recognized. Application of auction by lien is not auction for conversion into money but auction for securityright.
I think, Legal nature of application of auction by lien is application of auction by mortgage. Therefore, Application of auction by lien is recognized the legal effect of attachment, request of allotment and extinction principle.
There is a great difference between application of auction by lien and application of auction for conversion into money. First, Application of auction by lien is revealed in the money of credit. But, Application of auction for conversion into money is not revealed in the money of credit. Second, Korea Civil Law is prescribed at the application of auction for lien. It is trace a parallel between lien and another security interest.
An object of auction is satisfaction of creditors and protection of debtors. Especially, Lien have not registered in the register. So that, Purchaser can not buy at the Real Estate. Therefore, Creditor can not satisfaction and debtor can not puy back what debtor"s owes. For that reason, A lien is that not registered in the register, A lien must become extinct.
A great problem in the lien that was disguise lien. An example, The construction expenses of builder for the remodeling is a subject of lien. Then, Building owner and builder become inflated at the construction expenses. For that reason, Purchaser can not buy at the lien in the building.
The Civil Execution Law not be recognized the request of allotment by another creditors. It is mean that lien appear after a close of auction. This is due to acceptance principle that I insist on the restrictions extinction principle.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 유치권의 법적 성질
Ⅲ. 유치권자가 신청한 경매절차
Ⅳ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 유치권의 법적 성질
Ⅲ. 유치권자가 신청한 경매절차
Ⅳ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 附錄 외
- 우리 저작권법 체계상 저작자와 저작권의 귀속문제
- 노동관행의 성립과 효력 - 대판 2001.10.23, 2001다53950
- 종중의 ‘자연발생적 단체설’에 대한 소고
- 등기부취득시효에서 등기의 승계 여부
- 독일에 있어서 해제효과론의 전개
- 중ㆍ고등학교시험문제와 저작권 - 서울중앙지법 2006. 10. 18. 선고, 2005가합73377 판결(항소)
- 분묘기지권에 관한 소고
- 유치권자에 의한 경매신청
- 항공기사고와 불법행위 - 조종사ㆍ관제사과실책임을 중심으로
- 도산기업의 지배구조에 관한 연구
- 교회분열에 따른 재산귀속 - 대법원(전원합의체) 2006. 4. 20. 선고2004다37775 판결
- 대화자 사이의 무체적 의사표시의 효력발생
- 인체생물학적 물질의 이차적 이용과 「Informed Consent」 법리
- 信託受益權의 消滅時效
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!