학술논문
조론(肇論)에서의 반야(般若)와 공(空)개념성격 고찰
이용수 324
- 영문명
- The Analysis of the Concepts of Prajñā and Śūnya in Zhao-lun
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 허인섭(Heo In-Sub)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제11호, 257~293쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.08.01
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper aims at disclosing the influence of Neo-Taoist idea on Zhao-lun. In oredr to get the philosophical characteristics of Zhao-lun, this paper introduces the differences between the classical Taoism and Neo-Taoism. The most important difference between them is that Neo-Taoism shows a simple reductionism and a Chinese mode of metaphysical thinking, which are similar to western ones. This differences is important to analyze some delicate statements having two fold aspects formed to be influenced by both classical and Neo-Taoist idea.
In analyzing the above treatise, it must be firstly notified that the Chinese people in Wei-Chin period could not acknowledge clearly the similar and the different aspects of Buddhism and Taoism. It resulted in a serious misunderstanding among Chinese Buddhists regarding the original Indian Buddhist concepts, praj?? or ??nya, etc. Zhao-lun was also written in this period and could not be an exceptional one to overcome completely the limitation of the spirit of the times. Secondly, it needs to clarify the original meaning of ??nya and how Chinese Buddhist scholars transformed its meaning according to the Taoist or Neo-Taoist way of thinking. In this period, the concept of ??nya was understood as an fundamental nothingness which frequently mentioned in Wang-pi"s work. This way of understanding has maintained in the history of Chinese Buddhism.
However, this paper suggests that the concept of ??nya should be understood in the context of the history of Indian philosophy. In spite of that the concept of ??nya cannot be an ontological one, it has been interpreted ontologically or metaphysically not only by Chinese Buddhist monks but also by modern western philosophers. This paper points out that ??nya is a synonym of an?tma and should be understood in the light of the theory of "dependent arising"(緣起). By comparing the original meaning of ??nya and praj?? as the above with those seen in Zhao-lun, it discloses that Seng-zhao understood those concepts ontologically under the influence of Neo-Taoism.
In analyzing the above treatise, it must be firstly notified that the Chinese people in Wei-Chin period could not acknowledge clearly the similar and the different aspects of Buddhism and Taoism. It resulted in a serious misunderstanding among Chinese Buddhists regarding the original Indian Buddhist concepts, praj?? or ??nya, etc. Zhao-lun was also written in this period and could not be an exceptional one to overcome completely the limitation of the spirit of the times. Secondly, it needs to clarify the original meaning of ??nya and how Chinese Buddhist scholars transformed its meaning according to the Taoist or Neo-Taoist way of thinking. In this period, the concept of ??nya was understood as an fundamental nothingness which frequently mentioned in Wang-pi"s work. This way of understanding has maintained in the history of Chinese Buddhism.
However, this paper suggests that the concept of ??nya should be understood in the context of the history of Indian philosophy. In spite of that the concept of ??nya cannot be an ontological one, it has been interpreted ontologically or metaphysically not only by Chinese Buddhist monks but also by modern western philosophers. This paper points out that ??nya is a synonym of an?tma and should be understood in the light of the theory of "dependent arising"(緣起). By comparing the original meaning of ??nya and praj?? as the above with those seen in Zhao-lun, it discloses that Seng-zhao understood those concepts ontologically under the influence of Neo-Taoism.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 승조 시대의 사상적 배경
Ⅲ. 조론의 중국불교적 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
영문초록
Ⅱ. 승조 시대의 사상적 배경
Ⅲ. 조론의 중국불교적 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
영문초록
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 『성유식론(成唯識論)』의 화인(火人)의 비유에 나타난 은유의 문제
- 天台의 四一과 元曉의 四法
- 李通玄의 敎判論
- 부파불교의 선정론 - 『청정도론』과 『구사론』을 중심으로
- 조론(肇論)에서의 반야(般若)와 공(空)개념성격 고찰
- 在元 高麗人 관련의 大都寺院
- 불교의 생명관과 자비의 마음 - 불교 생태학의 정초를 위하여
- 大慧宗杲의 黙照禪비판의 대상에 대한 再考
- 澄?撰『十二因??』의 著者問題 - 新羅撰述의 可能性
- 불교적 평화문화 - 글로벌시대 URI운동의 불교적 성향과 참여론
- 멸진정(Nirodhasamāpatti)과 두 가지 열반 이론
- 근래 道信禪師 禪法 연구에 대한 반론(2)
- 퇴옹 성철(退翁 性徹)의 개혁사상 연구
- 간화선과 화엄, 회통인가 단절인가 - 보조 지눌과 퇴옹 성철의 관점을 중심으로
- 불교학연구회 활동일지(2005. 5~8) 외
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!