본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

李通玄의 敎判論

이용수 66

영문명
A Study on the Doctrinal Classification ofLi Tongxuan(李通玄)
발행기관
불교학연구회
저자명
임상희(Lim Sang-Hee)
간행물 정보
『불교학연구』제11호, 87~111쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 불교학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2005.08.01
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  Whenever we take a look at the thoughts of Chinese Buddhist philosophers, one of the most effective methods to approach their ideas is to understand their doctrinal classifications. Despite much criticism, studying their doctrinal classifications are still the easiest way to comprehend their ideas.
  In this paper, I inquire into the doctrinal classification of Li Tongxuan. The third patriarch Hua-yen School, Fa-tsang(法藏) is Li Tongxuan’s contemporary. Li Tongxuan, as a lay Buddhist practioner, he devoted himself to the study of both research and practice of the Avata?saka-s?tra. Most of the previous researches insist that Li Tongxuan was influenced by Fa-tsang in the fundamental theory. Apart from Fa-tsang, Li Tongxuan interpreted independently the Avata?saka-s?tra in terms of a unique and practical perspective.
  Li Tongxuan’s classification consists of Ten Schools(十宗) and Ten Doctrines(十敎). The reason why he classified them this way is that the Avata?saka-s?tra has a relatively clear difference from other sutras. He makes his classification, placing emphasis on the distinct character of ‘sudden enlightenment’ in the Avata?saka-s?tra. His concern is not the explanation of each doctrine but an independent and subjective approach to enlightenment.
  On this standpoint, he defined Ten Schools as ‘sudden enlightenment(頓悟成佛),’ and ‘Ten Doctrines’ as ‘instantaneous enlightenment(刹那成佛).’ Actually, these two are not different but fundamentally all the same. However, for convenience’s sake, I explained it separately.
  Li Tongxuan’s classification seems to lack logic and systematic analysis compared to Fa-tsang’s doctrinal classification. Also it lacks objectivity because of his excessive stress on the Avata?saka-s?tra. However, his practical standpoint fully corresponds to the teachings of the Avata?saka-s?tra.
  He strongly emphasizes ‘original Buddhahood(本來成佛)’ through explaining ‘sudden enlightenment’ and ‘instantaneous enlightenment.’ With this theory, he provides us with a clear and distinct way of practice. In conclusion, his practical standpoint exactly reflects the core idea of the Seon School which ultimately seeks enlightenment subjectively.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 기존 교판에 대한 입장
Ⅲ. 十宗十敎의 조직
Ⅳ. 결어
영문초록

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

임상희(Lim Sang-Hee). (2005).李通玄의 敎判論. 불교학연구, (11), 87-111

MLA

임상희(Lim Sang-Hee). "李通玄의 敎判論." 불교학연구, .11(2005): 87-111

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제