간화선과 화엄, 회통인가 단절인가 - 보조 지눌과 퇴옹 성철의 관점을 중심으로

• 영문명: Kanhwa-Zen(看話禪) and Hwaum(華嚴), to unionize to sever - centering around the viewpoints of Bojo-Chinul(普照知訥)and Toeong-Seongchul(退翁性徹) -
• 발행기관: 불교학연구회
• 저자명: 김방룡(Kim Bang-Ryong)
• 간행물 정보: 『불교학연구』제11호, 31~58쪽, 전체 28쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 불교학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.08.01

영문 초록

  Rencently there is a trend searching for identity of Korean Buddhism in Kanhwa-Zen(看話禪). Therefore we have the problem how we should set up the relation of Kanhwa-Zen with Hwaum(華嚴). Namely "to sever the relation of Kanhwa-Zen with doctrine representing Hwaum or to unionize positively with it, that is the problem about the standpoint of Kanhwa-Zen.
  In this paper, I raised that question, then I researched the answer by analyzing the viewpoint of Bojo-Chinul(普照知訥) introduced Kanhwa-Zen in Koryeo dynasty, and that of Toeong-Seongchul(退翁性徹), the supreme patriarch of the Chogye Order(曹溪宗).
  As you know, they devoted themselves to set up the relation Kanhwa-Zen with Hwaum among Korean Zen masters. The thoughts of "sudden awakening and gradual cultivation" and of "sudden awakening and sudden cultivation" instituted by them are become the greatest argument after emancipation from Japanese imperialism in the world of Korean Buddhism. That argument of the two thoughts has two central points. One is the problem of awakening and cultivation. The other is the problem of relation Kanhwa-Zen with Hwaum or interpretation of those thoughts.
  Bojo-Chinul has a unified standpoint of Kanhwa-Zen with Hwaum and Toeong-Seongchul has a separate standpoint of them about that argument. But If we inquire into their thoughts of inside, conflicted superficially, there is there suffering and effort to fix Kanhwa-Zen in those days.
  In this paper, I made clear that all of them, Bojo-Chinul"s and Toeong-Seongchul"s standpoints are the efforts to stimulate the tradition of Zen in their times. I think that Korean Buddhism has to hold on the unified standpoint of Kanhwa-Zen with Hwaum.

목차

Ⅰ. 시작하며
Ⅱ. 한국선과 화엄과의 인연
Ⅲ. 보조 지눌의 회통적 입장
Ⅳ. 퇴옹 성철의 단절적 입장
Ⅴ. 간화선과 화엄, 회통인가 단절인가
Ⅵ. 마치며
영문초록

키워드

Bojo-Chinul(普照知訥) Toeong-Seongchul(退翁性徹) Lee-Tonghyeon(李通玄) Daehae-Jonggo(大慧宗？) Kanhwa-Zen(看話禪) Hwaum(華嚴) 『Reserving Doubts About Observing Hwado』(『看話決疑論』) 『The Complete and Sudden Attainment of Buddhahood』(『圓頓成佛論』) 『Hsin Hua-yen lun』(『新華嚴論』) sudden awakening and gradual cultivation(頓悟漸修) sudden awakening and sudden cultivation(頓悟頓修)