專門家의 用役提供과 辯護士法上 報酬規定의 問題點

• 영문명: Unconstitutionality of Art. 34, Sec. 5 in Lawyers Act
• 발행기관: 한국헌법학회
• 저자명: 이승우(Lee Seung-Woo)
• 간행물 정보: 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第9卷 第4號, 241~269쪽, 전체 29쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2003.12.01

영문 초록

Article 34, section 5 in Lawyers Act overly limits the activity of non-attorneys, punishing those non-attorneys who engage in legal consultation gainfully. This paper points out that. the above article illegalizes the lawfulness of the service contract between the attorneys and non-attorney professionals. The Korean Bar Association irrationally attempts to punish those who share the reward/income between the contractors concerned according to a certain rate agreed upon. Such interpretation, I believe, is unconstitutional because it obstructs the freedom of occupation of non-attorneys, contradicting the rule of the free market system.

목차

1. 문제제기

2. 변호사의 법적 지위와 업무영역의 범위

3. 변호사법상 보수규정의 내용과 규정추지 및 운영실태

4. 변호사법상 보수규정의 문제점과 위헌성

5. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract