학술논문
공동주택의 하자보수 책임제도 개선방안
이용수 62
- 영문명
- Improvement Directions for Defects Liability System of Multi-family Housing in Korea
- 발행기관
- 한국건설산업연구원
- 저자명
- 이의섭
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국건설산업연구원 연구보고서』연구보고서 2002-01, 1~82쪽, 전체 87쪽
- 주제분류
- 공학 > 토목공학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2002.01.01
13,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Defects liability system is used as home warranty protection in Korea. The law of housing construction and the 'multi-family housing management regulation' imposes every vendor of multi-family house to correct defects within certain period after the date of inspection for use. Also, every vendor is required to deposit guarantee security in cash or surety bond to correct defects.
Nowadays, there are 44 lawsuits against the KCFC(Korea Construction Financial Cooperative) for defects of multi-family housing among 57 lawsuits for defects of all kinds of construction. The KCFC is a construction surety organization in Korea.
This study examines the reason why the number of lawsuits for defects of multi-family house is larger than for any other construction works as well as other problems with the defects liability system for multi-family house.
The problems with the defects liability system for multi-family house are as follows. First, the regulation does not specifically prescribe the scope of liability for defects. Every vendor of a multi-family house is liable for any defects caused by construction error that adversely affects function, aesthetic aspect or safety of the house in general.
Second, the vendor is liable for the defects for major load-bearing parts if the house is destructed or safety inspector determines it would be destructed.
Third, the regulation does not prescribe the liability of designer for design error and of technical auditor for checking error. Also, there is no provision who should provide proof whether the damage caused by the defects is payable.
Fourth, the problem with the current system is such that the vendor, not insurance company, is liable for the major defects of load-bearing parts even if it arise after three years passed. A great number of participants as well as drawn and written documents are part of the process. Such documents rarely progress unaltered through the several phases of the house project. Therefore, it may be almost impossible to provide proofs or call witness when the long time passed after the date of completion.
The solution to the problem mentioned above are as follows. The scope of defects liability should be specifically prescribed for each part as in Home Warranty Program in Japan.
The provision who should provide proof whether the damage caused by the defects is payable should be provided.
The insurance arrangement should be made. The no fault insurance for damage for major structural defects should be introduced. Also, the defects liability of the designer and technical auditor should imposed and the insurance for such defects liability is required. In addition, defects liability bond, which is currently optional, should be required.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 제도 현황
Ⅲ. 공동주택의 하자 발생 및 분쟁
Ⅳ. 하자 보수 책임 제도의 문제점
Ⅴ. 외국의 주택 보증 제도
Ⅵ. 하자보수 책임제도 개선방안
참고 문헌
부록: 하자 담보 책임 관련 프랑스 민법과 보험법
Abstract
요약
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 중국 건설시장의 환경 변화와 진출 전략
- 근로시간 단축에 따른 건설기업의 대응전략
- 환경 분야 건설 시장의 전망과 활성화 방안
- 공동주택의 하자보수 책임제도 개선방안
- 지방자치단체별 핵심 지역개발사업의 추진현황과 지원방안
- SOC 민간투자사업의 금융 조달 원활화 방안
- 건설산업의 재해율 산정 및 활용의 문제점과 개선방향
- 건설사업관리(CM)제도의 파급효과 - 사례 연구를 중심으로 -
- 유료 노인주거시설 시장 전망과 진입 전략
- IMF 이후 건설경영의 성패요인 분석
- 건설업체의 기업경영 개선사례 분석 - 워크아웃 기업을 중심으로 -
- 강남지역 주택시장 분석
- 21세기 건설환경 변화와 중장기 건설투자 전망
- 건설사업관리(CM) 제도 현황과 발전방향
- 주택정책이 부동산 시장에 미치는 효과 분석
- 건설산업의 당면과제와 대응방향
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!