학술논문
의료과오와 주의의무
이용수 67
- 영문명
- Malpractice and Standard of Care
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 전광백(Kwang-Baek Jun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』비교사법 제12권 3호, 187~224쪽, 전체 38쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.09.01
7,360원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Neglgence, the most common theory of liablity in medical malpractice litigation, is defined as "conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm."
The negligence cause of action geneally requires that four elements be established: (1) there exists an obligation of due care; (2) the duty is violated on the basis of the applicable standard of care; (3) whatever injuries or damages are sustained are proximately caused by the breach of duty; and (4) the plaintiff suffers compensable damages. The burden is on the plaintiff to establish each and every element of the negligence action.
The standard of conduct that is required to meet the obligation of "due care" is based upon what the "reasonable practioner" would do in like circumstances. The standard is not one of exellence or superior practice; it only requires that the physican exercise that degree of skill and care that would be expected of the average qualified practioner practicing under like circumstances. Such circumstances might include the location where the practioner conducts his practice and even the school of medcine to which he adheres. Thus, in a particular case, if two or more alternative procedures might have been used and the defendant selected one, the issue is whether a competent physicians would have done so, even if another would not. The standard is also not one of good faith; the fact that a physician meant well or practiced to the best of his ability is not relevant. Conduct is always measured by objective criteria in terms of how the reasonable practioner would perform under like circumstances.
Respectable minority theory is that certain procedures which might not be adopted by a majority of practicing phyisicians might still be acceptable to a "respectable minority" of such practitioners. Thus, if a choice can be made among various alternative approaches to treating a particular condition and a respectable minority of physicians would have selected one such procedure, a physician will not be held liable for malpractice, assuming, of course, reasonable skill and care were exercised in providing such care.
The standard of care that is applicable to a particular physician has historically depended, at least in part, on where he practices and what "school" of treament he follows. The geographical location where a physician practices has historically had a bearing on the standard of care to which he is held. The locality rule served primarily as a rule that would limit who could testify as an expert in a medical malpractice case.
The question of where in some cases the obligation of a physician is to adhere not only to the standard of the "average qualified practitioner" but to some higher standard is a difficult one. If, in a certain situation, a physician believes the acceptable medical practice to be unreasonably dangerous and he has sufficient expertise to know of a better practice, does he have an obligation to use his superior knowledge and skill? If so, he can not be held accountable if he fails to do so.
목차
Ⅰ. 서
Ⅱ. 주의의무의 의미
Ⅲ. 의사의 주의의무의 판단 시 고려 요소
Ⅳ. 결론
[참고문헌]
【ABSTRACT】
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 滿10歲 未滿 兒童의 道路交通에서의 法的地位向上을 위한 硏究 - 2002년 8월부터 시행되고 있는 獨逸의 개정된 損害賠償法을 참고하여
- 유럽연합의 기업결합규제에 관한 연구 - 이사회 기업결합규제규칙(Nr. 139 / 2004)을 중심으로 -
- 프랑스에서의 건축수급인 등의 하자담보책임법의 변천
- 법률행위가 민법 제103조에 의하여 무효인 경우에 있어서의 급여자의 반환청구 여부
- 유전자원과 전통지식 보호를 위한 특허법의 역할
- 소리바다 항소심판결에 관한 연구
- 스위스 채무법상 혼인중개나 파트너관계중개 위임
- 個人의 同一性(identity)의 商業的 利用에 대한 보호 법제 - 퍼블리시티권을 중심으로 -
- 동산양도등록제도의 도입필요성 - 일본의 동산양도등기제도를 중심으로 -
- 담보권의 실행절차에 관하여
- 사이버소유권에 관한 연구
- 외부감사인의 책임제한
- 의료과오와 주의의무
- 현행법상 M&A활성화의 법적 장애와 국내기업역차별제도
- 기업희생절차상 관리인에 관한 몇 가지 문제 - 관리인의 자격과 책임을 중심으로 하여 -
- 간행사
- 학회활동 현황(2005.1.1 - 2005.9.30) 외
- 企業結合規制의 본질에 따른 企業槪念의 理解 - 독일 경쟁제한방지법을 중심으로 -
- 독일의 비정규 근로 입법동향에 관한 연구
- 증권집단소송법상 이사의 허위공시책임
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!