Brief Report: Rater-Domain Interactions in the Consensual Assessment Technique

• 영문명: Brief Report: Rater-Domain Interactions in the Consensual Assessment Technique
• 발행기관: 대한사고개발학회
• 저자명: John Baer James C. Kaufman Matt Riggs
• 간행물 정보: 『The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving』제19권 제2호, 87~92쪽, 전체 6쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.10.31

영문 초록

There is some controversy regarding who are the most appropriate raters of artifacts when using the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) to assess creativity (e.g., whether novice raters' judgments can validly replace those of expert raters). There is also evidence that the answers to some of these questions vary by domain (e.g., novice raters' judgments more closely parallel those of expert raters when judging the creativity of fiction than when judging poetry). We report new evidence about the degree and kinds of expertise required for valid CAT judging that shows both vary by task domain. We compare these findings to previous research in this area and suggest (a) possible explanations for the observed raterdomain interactions and (b) guidelines for assembling panels of experts.

목차

REFERENCES

키워드

Creativity Assessment Expertise Consensual assessment technique Writing