학술논문
受給人의 瑕疵擔保責任에 있어 瑕疵의 槪念
이용수 77
- 영문명
- Defects of Independent Contractors Works
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 이준형(Lee, Joon-Hyong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제25호, 75~111쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.03.31
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The discovery of defects during work or after a project has been completed often generate disputes. An owner who believes he has not received the project to which he is entitled often seeks to transfer any resultant loss to those he claims have caused the defect. We have a dozen of civil code articles laying down defect liabilities, none of which introduce a definition of defects themselves. This study concentrates upon the concept of defects, especially of independent contractor s works. Historically traced, the understanding of the concept has changed so much during a very long period, that the historical explanation had better be a starting point. Roman expression of the contract for work, location conductio operis, didn t know the institution of defect liability but only the breach of agreements. Current defect liabilities have their roots in another Roman institution established and developed by official market regulators in the area of sale law, further developed and generalized into other contracts by natural law theorists and canonists, and finally codified into some early modern codes: French, Prusso-German, Austrian and Swiss. The resemblances and differences among them are scrutinized in this study(Part Ⅱ), mentioning several points as belows: What can we say be the characteristics of the work contract? Did the codification contain an separate chapter for the work contract, cover intangible defects as well? Was the regulation a sub-system of general breach of contract liability or an independent agreement-indifferent liability system? This study answers like this: Firstly, the party providing work has control over the performance process, but only has to use control for the other party s sake. Secondly, the objects of the work contract has been continuously spread all through the time. Thirdly, contractors defect liabilities could be called as products of practical needs on the doctrinal basis of contractual performance obligations, not those of historical traditions. Following the above observations, this research tries to make clear the possible standards of defective works(Part Ⅲ), at first with discussion starting from the defective goods in sale. Doctrines currently explain this as the absence of quality or performance that must be present at the goods, while they add the failure of promised quality in describing that. But such a dualism should be overcome; a defective work can be defined as failure of the work to meet the quality or quantity requirements expressed in or implied by the contract. Thus there is only one standard of agreed quality. And a differentiation must be made between expressed and implied agreement; to each of them apply general theories of agreement interpretation. Looking ahead, in interpreting, an important role might be played by the specified use expressively or impliedly agreed by both parties and supposed by the owner in the project contract. Very instructive is the German new legislation that gives up the requirement of additional warranties(“Zusicherung ) to end its prolonged dualism. Some people say that the currently increasing objective elements, such as public safety guidelines, could be a challenge to the subjective understanding; however, those should, not as it is but only in the complex process of contract interpretations, be admitted into agreement, and hereby into determining a defective work.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 개념의 역사적 검토
Ⅲ. 수급인의 담보책임의 성립요건으로서의 하자의 내용
Ⅳ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 잘못된 정보에 따른 직업전문가의 제3자에 대한 책임
- 외국인 근로자의 고용허가제서설
- 프랑스에서의 下都給法에 대한 槪觀
- 無賃乘車하는 行爲無能力者의 保護
- 유럽 손해배상법에 있어서의 위법성의 의미
- 계약에 있어서 법과 문화
- 授權行爲의 失效와 代理行爲의 相對方 保護
- 소프트웨어하자로 인한 손해의 제조물책임법리 적용여부
- 변호사의 성공보수약정
- Die Bedeutung der Rechtswidrigkeit im europäischen Schadenersatzrecht
- 독일 민법상 契約責任에 있어서 歸責事由의 變容
- 受給人의 瑕疵擔保責任에 있어 瑕疵의 槪念
- 根抵當權의 確定에 관한 연구
- 受給人의 債務不履行責任
- 계약의 합의로 인한 구속력과 계약협상의 부당파기의 한계
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!