본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

부당이득법의 인과관계와 법률상 원인

이용수 71

영문명
A Disscussion of the Causal Relation and the Legitimate Cause Recognized under the Unjust Enrichment Doctrine
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
朴世珉(Park, Sea Min)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제41호, 87~128쪽, 전체 42쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2008.06.30
7,840

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The Supreme Court of Korea has recently rendered its decision to clarify its attitude towards the right to restitution for unjust enrichment in a case where defrauded money was used to discharge of an obligation. A creditor who received any defrauded money from a defrauder-debtor must repay the amount received to the defrauded, only if he knew the fact that the money had been defrauded or did not know it because of his own gross negligence. This is due to the fact that his enrichment no longer stands as a legitimate explanatory cause. Previously, the Court has accepted the concept of ‘pass-through or ‘bypass of property in non-cash transaction. Therefore, now, under the Korean law of unjust enrichment, it possibly may not be fruitful to attempt to establish the connection between the enrichment and the impoverishment by analyzing to whom the ownership of money belong. Since money represents the very value itself, it is not of great importance to whom the money is under ownership. Even if the ownership of money belongs to a certain person, it does not mean that the causal relation is broken. The problem is, then, how to satisfactorily explain that the enrichment of the creditor, who was legitimately paid for an obligation of the defrauder-debtor, is ‘without a cause of action under the law. Considering the fact that the recipient-creditor s good faith or reliance ought to be protected under the Korean civil law, requiring the defrauded to prove ‘bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the recipient-creditor as a requirement for successfully making a restitutionary claim seems appropriate and compatible with other rules in the Korean Civil Code.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이른바 「편취금전에 의한 변제」
Ⅲ. 지시유형과 삼각관계일반론
Ⅳ. 「법률상 원인」과 「인과관계」
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

朴世珉(Park, Sea Min). (2008).부당이득법의 인과관계와 법률상 원인. 민사법학, (41), 87-128

MLA

朴世珉(Park, Sea Min). "부당이득법의 인과관계와 법률상 원인." 민사법학, .41(2008): 87-128

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제