본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

등가성 장애에 관한 연구

이용수 9

영문명
A Study on Equivalence Obstacle - focused on the discussion in Germany
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
정진명(Chung Jin-Myung)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제62호, 103~135쪽, 전체 33쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2013.03.31
6,760

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Contract extinction is the ultima ratio that could be allowed in a case where proper contract benefits do not exist to each contracting party any more. Contract extinction is determined by testing whether contract benefits exist or not. Contract extinction include two types: rescission of contract and cancellation of contract. Rescission is to aim to put contracting parties in the original positions before contract, considering changes of circumstances. Rescission applies only to a contract that could be performed in a short period of time. On the other hand, cancellation is to terminate contract relations in the future in a contract that should be performed continuously for certain period of time. However, the principle of pact sunt servanda should be observed. The change of contract on special conditions must be recognized only in an exceptional case. Contracting parties are required to perform original obligations. Equivalence of contract is breached if a change of contract is allowed. Equivalence obstacle belongs to risk of contract which contracting parties should undertake. Amendment of equivalence obstacle, therefore, has exceptional characteristics. Two circumstances that could lead to amendment of contract are change of circumstances in contract and important circumstances in cancellation. This research is to study the legal regulation on contract extinction from the point of view of change of contract. Especially, the 2009 civil code proposals include the general regulation on cancellation and the principle of change in circumstance. This study reviews the concept of equivalence obstacle, the standard of equivalence obstacle, and especially, equivalence obstacle as a justification of cancellation of contract.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 등가성 장애의 의의
Ⅲ. 등가성 장애의 판단
Ⅳ. 해지사유로서 등가성 장애
Ⅴ. 맺음말 - 우리 민법에의 시사점
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정진명(Chung Jin-Myung). (2013).등가성 장애에 관한 연구. 민사법학, (62), 103-135

MLA

정진명(Chung Jin-Myung). "등가성 장애에 관한 연구." 민사법학, .62(2013): 103-135

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제