본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

독점규제법상 부당한 공동행위에 대한 손해배상청구권의 소멸시효

이용수 16

영문명
Prescription of the right to claim damages from cartel
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
이선희(Sun Hee Lee)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제70호, 307~346쪽, 전체 40쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2015.03.31
7,600

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Not a few cartels last for a considerable period of time compared with other torts. For one example, a corporation continues to carry out price fixing which comes from a collusion with other corporations for substantial amount of time. For the other example is that, by the result of construction bid-rigging, successful bidders construct and get paid over a period of time. Our civil law has 3-year short-term subjective imitation and 10-year long-term objective limitation. In applying the former one, it is important to confirm when the injured party becomes aware of damages resulting from an unlawful act and of the identity of the person who caused it. In applying the latter, it is notable that a limitation does not run until the unlawful act was committed, namely the accrual of injury. Especially when the illegal act repeats or continues and the damages of it also continue to happen, it is very difficult to determine whether the limitation should wait to commence until a continuous or repeated infringement ceases. Recently, some cases dealt with such issues in our courts, even though supreme court decisions did not come out yet. To review these cases, I studied examples of legislations of other countries s in both civil law and antitrust law, court cases and theories of scholars. Aided by continuous tort theory , I propose some opinion in view of application of law and legislation. In dealing with cases of prescription, we must give victims of a tort a reasonable opportunity to bring a damages action, while ensuring an appropriate level of legal certainty for all parties involved. Good faith principle in application of existing law can help to get a reasonable solution dealing with fraudulent concealment and pendency of government action. Introduction of suspension system which other countries have can be regarded, too.

목차

Ⅰ. 序
Ⅱ. 부당한 공동행위에 대한 손해배상청구의 특성과 소멸시효
Ⅲ. 부당한 공동행위에 대한 손해배상청구권의 소멸시효 기산점
Ⅳ. 소멸시효의 진행차단⋅완성유예
Ⅴ. 결
<참고문헌>

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이선희(Sun Hee Lee). (2015).독점규제법상 부당한 공동행위에 대한 손해배상청구권의 소멸시효. 민사법학, (70), 307-346

MLA

이선희(Sun Hee Lee). "독점규제법상 부당한 공동행위에 대한 손해배상청구권의 소멸시효." 민사법학, .70(2015): 307-346

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제