학술논문
유럽의 온라인서비스제공자 책임의 법리 구성
이용수 50
- 영문명
- A Comparative Study on the Liability of Online Service Provider in Europe
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 김수정(Kim, Soo Jeong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제76호, 219~265쪽, 전체 47쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2016.09.30
8,440원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
A study on the ISP liability in Europe can provide for an interesting and valuable example, how this recently discussed problem is solved in the various legal systems. Although the Directive 2000/31/EC provides a common basis for this liability in Europe, the regulations contained in the Directive are limited to the liability privilege and give no structural guidance. But the interpretation of CJEU that a provider can be exempt from any liability for unlawful data that it has stored on condition that it has confined itself to a merely technical and automatic processing of data and should have not played an active role allowing it to have knowledge or control of the data stored, played a role in deciding the standard of reasonable duty of care which is demanded for providers. The German Supreme Court bases its concept of the liability of providers on the interferers liability (Störerhaftung). But this liability cannot be applied to infringement of non-absolute rights (copyright, trade mark right and personality right), so it develops another indirect liability system due to the violation of reasonable duty of care (Verkehrspflichtverletzung). So two structurally different concepts coexist in the case of absolute rights on the one hand and in the case of illegality deriving from illegal action on the other hand. In spite of this dualistic system both the concepts presuppose the reasonable duty of care which has almost the same meaning in both cases. In England the High Court overcame the jurisdiction to grant an injunction by leading back to the High Court s power to issue injunctions conferred by the Senior Courts Act 1981 and to the judgement of CJEU. The French Courts established a broad concept of liability which is enabled by Articles 1382 and 1383 of the Code Civil. Because this liability is labelled as a general tort liability, the remedies for this action are not limited to injunctive relief. The question of whether or not to adopt a dualistic or unitary concept of liability is not easy. From this author’s view the courts of each countries developed its own model on the consideration of its already established legal concept. More meaningful question will be the concrete standard of duty of care. Of course the difference between dualistic and unitary concept might lead to the difference of whether to grant compensation for damages, thus it worths to argue still.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. EU에서의 온라인서비스제공자 책임 개관
Ⅲ. 독일에서의 온라인서비스제공자 책임
Ⅳ. 영국
Ⅴ. 프랑스
Ⅵ. 우리법에의 시사
<참고문헌>
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- 장애인재활상담사 보수교육 운영에 관한 인식 연구: 재활관련 기관 종사자 FGI를 기반으로
- 장애인재활상담사의 직무요인과 상담 전문성, 자기효능감이 심리적 소진에 미치는 영향
- 발달장애 근로 청년의 1인 가구 자립생활 지원 욕구에 관한 연구: 장애 당사자⋅보호자⋅지원인력을 중심으로
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!