본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

계약당사자의 신뢰와 해지의 자유

이용수 53

영문명
Contractual Trust and Freedom of Rescission for the Furure-Focused on Rescission of the Mandate Contract-
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
정진명(Chung, Jin Myung)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제76호, 175~217쪽, 전체 43쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.09.30
7,960

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

According to the Art. 689 (1) and Korean Civil Law(KCC), either party of contract may terminate a contract of a mandate for the future at any time. Also, according to the Art. 660 (1) KCC, either party may give notice to the other party of his intention to terminate the contract for the future at any time If no period for the employment has been fixed by the parties, Furthermore, even where a fixed period for the employment has been set by the parties, either party may, if any unavoidable cause arises, terminate the contract for the future(Art. 661 KCC). KCC has provided the freedom of contract termination in a certain types of the contract besides the general reason of the termination. The reason for the freedom of contract termination is based on the extraordinary personal confidential relation between both parties, and then either party can arbitrarily terminate the mandate contract each other and the contract of employment at any time. The common doctrine in Korea has agreed with the result, that the contract based on the confidential relation between both parties can be terminated without the reason of the loss of confidence or the breach of trust, he or she shall not compensate the other party for any damages occasioned by such termination, and the terminated party was accepted by the subjective emotion of the one of the parties. But the personal confidence is not meant the individual trust that a mandatary shall manage the affairs entrusted to him, but the trust with the care of a good manager in accordance with the tenor of the mandate. These kinds of confidence can be founded in loan for consumption and other contracts for the trust. Therefore, the common doctrine in Korea raise a question about whether it has justified to accept the freedom of contract termination based on the confidential relation between both parties. In oder to examine those questions, this study is willing to research the history of legislation of the freedom of contract termination in German Civil Law that is based on the legislation of KCC. In the case of the freedom of contract termination in German Civil Law, there are provisions of the contract of a mandate(Art. 671) and the contract for employment, which have provided the employee with services of the high quality based on the extraordinary personal confidential relation between both parties(Art. 627). Especially, this study is going to examine the correlation between the meanings of the personal confidence and the freedom of contract termination, and the consistency between the termination of a mandate and the termination on the other contract.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 독일민법상 계약당사자의 신뢰와 해지의 자유
Ⅲ. 우리 민법상 계약당사자의 신뢰와 해지의 자유
Ⅳ. 맺음말
<참고문헌>

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정진명(Chung, Jin Myung). (2016).계약당사자의 신뢰와 해지의 자유. 민사법학, (76), 175-217

MLA

정진명(Chung, Jin Myung). "계약당사자의 신뢰와 해지의 자유." 민사법학, .76(2016): 175-217

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제