본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

用事의 개념과 범주에 대한 재검토

이용수 9

영문명
A Reappraisal on the Concept and Category of Yongsa[用事]
발행기관
국문학회
저자명
구본현(Gu, Bon Hyeon)
간행물 정보
『국문학연구』제19호, 139~169쪽, 전체 31쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 한국어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2009.05.31
6,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Although there have been a lot of researches on it, the concept of the term, Yongsa[用事] is still not clearly defined. It is because there have been unsolved problems with regard to the characters of the source of Yongsa , and the exact meaning of Sa[事] and Yong[用]. It is common knowledge that the source of Yongsa should be in the form of literature but actually the contents transmitted by word of mouth can be included in Sa. The scope of the source of Sa varies depending on the belief and cognitive structure of those who use and accept Yongsa. Also, the scope of the source varies depending on the character of the text or the circumstances of writing. What belong to Sa are event, knowledge, contention, and the method of formation. Some scholars distinguish it from the Yongsa of the method of formation as Jeomhwa[點化]. In this study, Jeomhwa is regarded as being included in Yongsa , but in order to solve this controversy, separate researches are needed. With regard to the meaning of Yong , the terms Gayong[假用] , Chayong[借用] , and Banyong[反用] become controversial issues. Gayong is not useful since it is not the term that denotes the method in which Yongsa is formed. Chayong should be regarded as a method to use one of new meanings derived from original meaning. With regard to Banyong , the question of whether Yeongsa poetry[詠史詩]“ or Nonsa poetry[論史詩]” can be regarded as cases of Banyong arises. In conclusion, Yongsa can be defined as a method of composition that quotes or modifies former text s event, knowledge, assertion, the method of formation, and makes them as part of the text in order to enhance the persuasiveness and appeal of the meaning and sentiments of the message to be conveyed.

목차

1. 서론
2. 出典과 관련된 문제
3. ‘事’의 의미와 범주
4. ‘假用’, ‘借用’, ‘反用’의 의미
5. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

구본현(Gu, Bon Hyeon). (2009).用事의 개념과 범주에 대한 재검토. 국문학연구, (19), 139-169

MLA

구본현(Gu, Bon Hyeon). "用事의 개념과 범주에 대한 재검토." 국문학연구, .19(2009): 139-169

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제