마취통증의학과 임상실습은 지식, 수기, 태도 영역에서 고르게 평가되고 있는가?

• 영문명: Is The Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes in Anesthesiology Clerkships Balanced?
• 발행기관: 한국의학교육학회
• 저자명: 김경한(Kyung Han Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『Korean Journal of Medical Education』제15권 제3호, 213~219쪽, 전체 7쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2003.12.31

영문 초록

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate whether the student knowledge, skills, and attitudes in anesthesiology clerkships were properly assessed in 18 medical schools. Methods: The author examined the survey questionnaire returned from anesthesiology professors of 8 medical schools planning to be accredited and self-assessed reports published by 10 accredited medical schools. Results: The student knowledge (50%) was given a higher value in the evaluation than skills (25%) and attitudes (25%). The student knowledge was mainly evaluated using oral/written examinations, reports, recording of patient s data, and case/article presentations. The student attitude was assessed using only attitudes and attendance items. At more than half of the 13 schools, student skills were assessed based on 15 skills including insertion of iv line, intubation, blood pressure measurement, airway keep, CPR, monitoring, iv fluid /transfusion setting, arterial blood gas and Ambu ‘bagging in order of frequency. However, student skills were not evaluated in 3 of the 18 schools. Conclusion: The evaluation process should be performed adequately for student knowledge, skills and attitudes in anesthesiology clerkships. Moreover, It is inappropriate to include attendance in the student s attitude evaluation as attendance is mandatory in clinical clerkship. These results suggest that the student s clinical performance (i.e., skills and attitudes) should be evaluated objectively by using OSCE, or CPX.

목차

서 론

대상 및 방법

결 과

고 찰

참 고 문 헌

키워드

Assessment Anesthesiology Clerkships