본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

보조참가이익의 재검토 - 소송결과의 범위를 중심으로

이용수 0

영문명
A Reconsideration on the Requirement for Auxiliary Intervention : Focusing on the Meaning of the Litigation Outcome
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
김상수(Sangsoo Kim)
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제29권 제1호, 299~320쪽, 전체 22쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2025.02.28
5,440

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

Among the four systems of intervention in litigations, the first to appear in the Civil Procedure Code is “auxiliary intervention,” and the provisions related to it are generally applied to other forms of intervention as well. Auxiliary intervention refers to a situation where a third party with an interest in the outcome of a litigation participates in the case to help one of the parties win the litigation. One of the requirements for auxiliary intervention is the existence of a legal interest in the litigation outcome, which is the main theme of this research. There is a scholarly debate about whether the legal interest in the litigation outcome pertains only to the judgment’s main text (the subject of the litigation) or whether it also includes the reasoning behind the judgment. The purpose of this study is to re-examine the meaning of the litigation outcome, which forms the basis of the legal interest, a crucial issue when determining the benefit of auxiliary intervention. In reviewing Dr. Lee Si Yoon’s viewpoint, I sought to shed new light on it by comparing domestic legal theories and case law, as well as the situation in Japanese law, which has greatly influenced Korean law. I think that the litigation outcome should be understood as the entire judgment, not just the main text of the judgment. Interpreting it narrowly, limiting it to the main text, is a very rigid interpretation that may not effectively respond to the changes of the times. Dr. Lee’s many viewpoints, especially those regarding the benefits of auxiliary intervention, were a significant challenge or barrier that later academic theories needed to overcome. Although Dr. Lee’s viewpoint remains powerful, it may eventually change. I look forward to the development of active discussions on the benefits of auxiliary intervention in the future.

영문 초록

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 이시윤 박사의 견해
Ⅲ. 판례와 학설의 전개
Ⅳ. 일본법의 대응
Ⅴ. 나오며

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김상수(Sangsoo Kim). (2025).보조참가이익의 재검토 - 소송결과의 범위를 중심으로. 민사소송, 29 (1), 299-320

MLA

김상수(Sangsoo Kim). "보조참가이익의 재검토 - 소송결과의 범위를 중심으로." 민사소송, 29.1(2025): 299-320

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제