본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

소송판결에 대한 상소와 불이익변경금지

이용수 0

영문명
Appeal on Dismissal of Lawsuit and Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
정상민(Sang Min Jung)
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제29권 제1호, 185~253쪽, 전체 69쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2025.02.28
11,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

Article 415 of the Civil Procedure Act only stipulates that “A judgment of the first instance may be altered within the extent of dissatisfaction therewith” under the title “Scope of Admitting Appeal”. It is only an expression of principle of disposition in the appeal, there is no dispute that the principle of prohibiting change of disadvantage is interpreted and recognized. It is difficult to deny that the prohibition of changing disadvantages, which emerged as a guiding ideology in the process of rejecting the principle of common appeal, is ultimately defined as the principle of restraining applications, which is a form of principle of disposition in the appeal. As long as the prohibition of change of disadvantage is regarded as the expression of principle of disposition, which are the basic principles of civil procedure or hearing, the subject of this article, that is, “The Court of Appeal cannot make a substantial judgment on the original judgment, which is a litigant judgment due to the prohibition of change of disadvantage, in accordance with the proviso to Article 415 of the Act on the grounds that the claim is unprovoked.” This is the position of Korean and Japanese precedents. However, given that many policy decisions are made in the structure and rationalization of the procedure of appeals, it is possible to punish profits with other factors by revising and supplementing the position of this essential theory into a policy theory. In the case of policy considerations, principle of prohibiting change of disadvantage can function and be used as a supplementary law in cases where formal and mechanical application of principle of disposition hinders guarantee of appeal rights and interests of appellants and their counterparts. In Germany, Japan and Korea, this theory holds a majority status. This may be because the theoretical basis has its own rationality and validity, and the conclusion has concrete validity. Furthermore, the Seoul High Court's ruling, which carefully reviewed the subject of this paper, raised a better argument based on the claim dismissal theory. If so, the elements, methods, and arguments of the profit sentence can be refined into the Seoul High Court's ruling above based on the theoretical basis that the sentence of profit based on the policy theory can be supplemented in the existing essential theory (the theory of principle of disposition). In the end, based on these discussions, it is expected that the Supreme Court will change in the future.

영문 초록

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연혁에 대한 검토
Ⅲ. 이론적 근거에 대한 검토
Ⅳ. 비교법적 검토
Ⅴ. 종합적 검토
Ⅵ. 맺음말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정상민(Sang Min Jung). (2025).소송판결에 대한 상소와 불이익변경금지. 민사소송, 29 (1), 185-253

MLA

정상민(Sang Min Jung). "소송판결에 대한 상소와 불이익변경금지." 민사소송, 29.1(2025): 185-253

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제