본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

대체물 인도의무의 집행불능에 대비한 대상청구 - 대법원 2024. 7. 25. 선고 2021다239905 판결에 대한 평석을 겸하여

이용수 0

영문명
Substitute Claim in Anticipation of the Impossibility of Execution of the Obligation to Deliver Fungible Goods
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
전휴재(Huy Jae Chon)
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제29권 제1호, 255~298쪽, 전체 44쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2025.02.28
8,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

The Supreme Court's decision on July 25, 2024, in case 2021Da239905, pertains to a matter involving a claim for the delivery of shares, which are fungible goods, and a substitute claim in anticipation of the impossibility of execution. This decision provides a concise and accurate ruling based on a legal understanding of the substantive nature of the substitute claim, the procedural nature of the joinder of the original claim and the substitute claim, the occurrence of the right to claim damages under Article 395 of the Civil Code and the right to refuse acceptance in the event of the impossibility of execution of the original obligation, and the effect of the performance of the original obligation after the occurrence of the right to refuse acceptance. It also reasonably addresses the detailed issues included in the grounds for appeal to reach a valid conclusion. The substitute claim, which is filed in conjunction with the original claim in anticipation of the impossibility of execution of the original claim, historically began mainly in relation to claims for the delivery of grains such as rice, but recently it has been widely used for fungible goods with significant economic value in modern society, such as stocks and Bitcoin. In terms of its legal nature, the substitute claim is a substantive right to claim damages under Article 395 of the Civil Code, but in the execution of non-monetary claims such as the obligation to deliver fungible goods, it functions as a practical and effective means of execution by supplementing the difficulties of execution through direct compulsion with monetary execution. Despite its importance, there has been little research or recent case law on the substitute claim in anticipation of the impossibility of execution of the obligation to deliver fungible goods in South Korea. It is hoped that this Supreme Court decision will serve as an opportunity for extensive and in-depth research in practice and academia on related issues, including whether to allow separate remedies for creditors or debtors in the event of a change in the value of the original object of performance after the conclusion of the fact-finding hearing.

영문 초록

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 대상판결의 개요
Ⅲ. 본래 급부의무의 집행불능에 대비한 대상청구
Ⅳ. 본래 급부의무의 집행불능
Ⅴ. 대상판결에 대한 검토
Ⅵ. 마치며

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

전휴재(Huy Jae Chon). (2025).대체물 인도의무의 집행불능에 대비한 대상청구 - 대법원 2024. 7. 25. 선고 2021다239905 판결에 대한 평석을 겸하여. 민사소송, 29 (1), 255-298

MLA

전휴재(Huy Jae Chon). "대체물 인도의무의 집행불능에 대비한 대상청구 - 대법원 2024. 7. 25. 선고 2021다239905 판결에 대한 평석을 겸하여." 민사소송, 29.1(2025): 255-298

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제