阿尔都塞的“认识论断裂”：对马克思主义的重解还是曲解？

• 영문명: Althusser’s “Epistemological Fracture”:A Reinterpretation or Misinterpretation of Marxism?
• 발행기관: YIXIN 출판사
• 저자명: 吴圣(Wu Sheng) 莫泽民(Mo Zemin)
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences』제2권 제5호, 26~32쪽, 전체 7쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2024.10.31

국문 초록

After the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the new Marxist thought in Eastern Europe ushered in an intense and diversified development trend of theoretical debate. In order to oppose the then-popular interpretations of Marxism such as humanism, Louis Althusser attempted to conduct a new scientific interpretation of Marx’s thought through his “symptomatic reading method”. On this basis, he proposed the famous “epistemological break” and believed that this method could clearly define the scientific nature of Marxism, thereby clearing away the historical and philosophical misunderstandings caused by humanism. However, this method used has resulted in the fragmentation of Marx’s thought and deviated from the original intention of clarification. Based on a critical analysis of Althusser’s “epistemological break”, this paper points out its disadvantages at the theoretical and practical levels, and discusses to what extent Althusser’s methodology has misinterpreted Marx’s core thought and how it has affected subsequent research and interpretation of Marxism.

영문 초록

苏共二十大后，东欧新马克思主义思潮迎来了理论争鸣热烈且多元的发展态势，为了反对当时对马克思主义进行的人道主义等流行的解释，路易·阿尔都塞试图通过他的“证候阅读法”来对马克思的思想进行新的科学解读。在此基础上，他提出了著名的“认识论断裂”，并且认为这种方法能够清晰地界定马克思主义的科学本质，从而清除了人道主义对其的历史和哲学上的误解。但使用的这种方法结果却是对马克思思想进行了割裂，背离其本意的澄清。本文在批判性分析阿尔都塞“认识论断裂”的基础上，指出其在理论和实践层面上的弊端，并探讨阿尔都塞的方法论在何种程度上误读了马克思的核心思想，以及如何影响了后续对马克思主义的研究和解读。

목차

Ⅰ. 引言

Ⅱ. 阿尔都塞理论的提出背景

Ⅲ. “认识论断裂”的提出与解析

Ⅳ. 阿尔都塞解读的批判性分析

Ⅴ. 阿尔都塞理论的当代批判

Ⅵ. 结论

키워드

Cognitive fracture theory Althusser Ideology Reinterpretation 认识断裂论 阿尔都塞 意识形态 重解