관광관련 학회지 심사위원들의 투고논문 심사기준 및 게재판정방식 분석

• 영문명: An Analysis of Tourism-related Journal Reviewers' Paper Review Criteria and their Preference toward Paper Evaluation Method
• 발행기관: 한국관광학회
• 저자명: 차석빈
• 간행물 정보: 『관광학연구』제35권 제1호, 13~31쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 관광학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.02.28

영문 초록

This study was to identify the dimensions that reviewers consider impor- tant when they review and evaluate journal papers. Data were collected at several tourism academic conferences from 137 people who had experiences on journal paper review. Results revealed that in their review process, the respondents considered several criteria to be important in the following orders: research originality, clarity of research objective, consistency between research objective and research findings, and interpretation and discussion. In contrast, in terms of paper evaluation, the respondents considered research design, research findings to be more important than research topic, and literature review. Regarding the final evaluation method of papers, the respondents preferred reviewing each criteria with different weight to reviewing the criteria with same weight. They also preferred deciding the final evaluation based not on the point system of journals but on their own judgement.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경

Ⅲ. 연구방법

Ⅳ. 분석결과

Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언

참고문헌

키워드

심사기준 관광관련 학회지 논문평가 Review criteria Tourism-related journals Research evaluation