T. S. 이은실엘리엇의 「황무지」와 김기림의 「기상도」

• 영문명: T. S. Eliot’s The Waste Land and Kim Ki-Rim’s Ki-Sang-Do
• 발행기관: 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
• 저자명: 이은실
• 간행물 정보: 『T. S. 엘리엇연구』제21권 제1호, 81~112쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.06.30

영문 초록

This essay surveys some literary, cultural criticism of T. S. Eliot and Kim Ki-Rim, focusing on each writer’s works, The Waste Land and Ki-Sang-Do. In Eliot’s creative and critical practice, his primary concern is to depict his own literature and culture. In other words, he seems to concentrate only on the fate of European literature, art, and cultural heritage, including the political balance of European countries. Therefore, the important issue for Eliot is how they can preserve and develop the tradition of Europe, both to make political peace among the European countries and to achieve “maturity” of their own culture. But Kim Ki-Rim, whose colonial circumstances are quite different from Eliot’s, is affected by double obstacles, the chaos of the pre-modern, underdeveloped Cho-sun and the period of colonial-imperialism from Japan (and the western countries), the prevalent international order then, with cultural ideology of modernity or modernism. In such a situation, Kim Ki-Rim does not concern himself with the idea of preserving the tradition of Europe-originated modernity. Rather, he suggests a possibility of breaking through the very western modernity and modernism, ultimately to build a whole new world, in which post-modern Cho-sun can hold a secure, culturally leading position.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 『황무지』의 구성과 엘리엇의 시학

Ⅲ. 『기상도』의 제작의도와 그 의의

Ⅳ. 맺음말

인용문헌

키워드

T. S. 엘리엇 「황무지」 김기림 「기상도」 모더니즘 전통 탈근대성 T. S. Eliot The Waste Land Kim Ki-Rim Ki-Sang-Do Modernism Tradition Post-modernity