본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

정부수립과 한국근현대사 속에서 광복·건국의 연속과 단절

이용수 153

영문명
Continuity and Separation of the Foundation of the Republic of Korea and Liberation in 1945
발행기관
한국근현대사학회
저자명
辛珠柏(Sin, Ju-back)
간행물 정보
『한국근현대사연구』제48집, 54~80쪽, 전체 27쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2009.03.30
6,040

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This paper is motivated from the social debates which occurred in the first quarter of 2008 about the change of the title of the national holiday at 15th, August from Liberation Day to Founding Government Day. This paper examines the social and historical context of the debate through history. The matter how to identify the situation of Korea in the late 1940s requires more detailed explanations of the political topography Korea occupied at the time. So to speak, according to varied definitions of the 15th, August, some would say it should be celebrated for liberation from 35-years Japanese occupation, or other would argue for the official foundation of an independent democratic government in Korean peninsula. There is also some group of people suggesting the 1945’s government was just a half-representative government built only in the South from 3/8 parallel. According to their argument, the implication of the 15th, August National Holiday comes to have another phase. When we extend the viewpoints over the debate, it seems clear that the process of the foundation of the Republic of Korea contributes to this matter; the social debates over the identification of the 15th, August National Holiday was driven by some different political groups arguing over how the relationship between the Provisional Korean Government in China during the Japanese Occupation with the present Korean government can be established: the key is, therefore, on how to determine the relationship between two governments in the past and the present. Taking close look at the platform of the Provisional Korean Government in Korea, it seems clear that the national platform of the government was not capitalist democracy, or communist revolution. Instead, the Provisional Government followed the principles which could have complement potential flaws of both ideological lines, capitalism and socialism. Having followed socialists independent movement during the Japanese occupation, the Provisional Government decided the issue of independence should be their priority, not the ideological identification, which required cooperation of the varied political parties. Based on this, the Korean Constitution was established: politically the democratic republic was pursued, and socio-economically many elements of the socialist democracy were introduced in it. But the reality was different. The domestic and international political topography developed rather unexpectedly. As the 3/8 parallel became a division of Korean peninsula, political tension between North and South also deepened, which left out anti-communism and exclusive free market capitalism in the South without room for any varied political opinions. And some political events after division this phenomenon became internalization among Korean in South. In fact, the government which began its office in the 15th, August 1945, in South Korea was not an integrated government which represented both of South and North Korea.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 논란의 지점-광복절인가, 건국절인가
3. 민족운동과 정부수립의 정신사적 맥락
4. 정부수립의 정치과정과 현대사 인식
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

辛珠柏(Sin, Ju-back). (2009).정부수립과 한국근현대사 속에서 광복·건국의 연속과 단절. 한국근현대사연구, 48 , 54-80

MLA

辛珠柏(Sin, Ju-back). "정부수립과 한국근현대사 속에서 광복·건국의 연속과 단절." 한국근현대사연구, 48.(2009): 54-80

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제