본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

만주사변 전후 국내 민족주의 계열의 재만조선인 국적문제 제기와 민족인식의 논리

이용수 112

영문명
Domestic Nationalists’ Nationality Problem Rasing for Koreans in Manchuria and Logic of National Recognition between before and after the Manchurian Incident
발행기관
한국근현대사학회
저자명
蔡貫植(Chae, Kwan-shik)
간행물 정보
『한국근현대사연구』제69집, 104~137쪽, 전체 34쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2014.06.30
6,880

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The late 1920s, Nationalists’ naturalization as a Chinese of Koreans in Manchuria is trying to secure the rights and profits of Koreans in Manchuria. Nationalists criticized the Japanese imperialism that does not allow withdrawal of nationality of Japanese nationality. And there was a position different from those of the independence movement of forces Manchuria emphasize the armed struggle on the other hand. Nationalists argued that naturalization as a Chinese in terms of ability training of Koreans in Manchuria. This was intended to ensure a stable base of Koreans, and to provide a foundation for long-term development. Nationalist’s naturalization as a Chinese of Koreans in Manchuria was extended in response to positive changes in the immigration policy of China in 1931. Nationalists was the goal of determining the stability of the Koreans in Manchuria life is to secure a substantial benefit in residence Externally. At the same time, was raised in a big way Koreans in Manchuria problem by organizing a powerful organization central to the inward manner. Claiming the logic that it must help with the pain of sympathy nation through which, it is intended to ensure the dominant influence on Korean society. After the Manchurian Incident, cognition of Koreans in Manchuria nationalists became a request and expectations of realistic measures of the Japanese Government General of Korea and Manchukuo. Such a change because of being based on the target Koreans in Manchuria problem recognition of nationalist since the 1920s is not a confrontation with imperialism, that aspire to political and economic growth and ability training for securing profits realistic was. And such claims were justified by the choice for the nation. However, civil rights of Manchukuo that nationalists were oriented was vulnerable enough to be limited by the conflict of colonial rule system to another. And civil rights of Manchukuo limit the rights, forced to the obligation. Nevertheless, rather than criticize the fiction of civil rights of Manchukuo, nationalists was want to reduce the discrimination and to secure civil rights in such. Nationalists believed to be able to get the full rightsby doing so. Nationalists were expected to be capable of substantive benefit is ensured. Then nationalists accepted the logic of the system incorporated.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 1920년대 일본의 만주정책과 재만조선인 사회의 위기
3. 1920년대 후반~1930년대 초 민족주의 계열의 재만조선인 국적문제 제기
4. 만주사변 이후 민족주의 계열의 인식변화와 만주국 공민권 획득론
5. 맺음말
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

蔡貫植(Chae, Kwan-shik). (2014).만주사변 전후 국내 민족주의 계열의 재만조선인 국적문제 제기와 민족인식의 논리. 한국근현대사연구, 69 , 104-137

MLA

蔡貫植(Chae, Kwan-shik). "만주사변 전후 국내 민족주의 계열의 재만조선인 국적문제 제기와 민족인식의 논리." 한국근현대사연구, 69.(2014): 104-137

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제