학술논문
한국 형사사법제도에서의 견제와 균형 원칙에 대한 비교법적 연구
이용수 201
- 영문명
- A Comparative Legal Study on Checks and Balances in the Criminal Justice System of Korea : For the Debate on Reallocation of the Investigatory Authority
- 발행기관
- 한국형사정책학회
- 저자명
- 강성용(Kang, Sung Yong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사정책』刑事政策 第30卷 第2號, 199~232쪽, 전체 34쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2018.09.30
6,880원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Prosecutor s Office, an organization carrying out an imperative role in the criminal justice system, is a legacy of the principle of checks and balances attainable through a functional separation of powers. The principle of checks and balances achievable through a functional separation of powers has been recognized as a natural law based on an intrinsic human nature applicable to all times and places by all the states, and even long before the emergence of the concept of state as a sovereignty. However, ironically in Korea, the principle which brought forth the Prosecutor s Office in the criminal justice system has been collapsed by the Prosecutor s Office itself.
Even when no checks and balances on the natural function of the Prosecutor s Office―prosecution authority as its name signifies―exists in Korea unlike the other states compared such as U.S, U.K, France and Germany in this research, Korea is the only state where the Prosecutor s Office dominates an additional crucial function―investigation authority―in the criminal justice system. A discretionary authority to request a warrant as an indispensable investigative measure has been monopolized by the Prosecutor s Office. Furthermore, the Prosecutor s Office is prescribed with a robust authority to direct investigations of the National Police Agency backed up by a legal obligation of police officers to obey the directions of prosecutors and an authority to request a removal or
disciplinary action against disobeying police officers. The Prosecutor s Office are provided with personnel and material resources as well as a legal authority to actually investigate crimes by itself.
The global standard is checks and balances attainable through functional separation of investigation and prosecution. However, despite of the fact that Korea requires a strict functional separation of investigation and prosecution to incorporate the principle of checks and balances into its criminal justice system more than any other states compared as checks and balances on the prosecution authority as a natural authority of the Prosecutor s Office is absent, the Prosecutor s Office in Korea dominates even investigations in addition to prosecutions. We have witnessed
serious negative outcomes brought by the collapse of checks and balances and functional separation of powers allowing excessive or insufficient exercises of authorities by the Prosecutor s Office on its own discretion.
Sadly, people―the ultimate source of any and all governmental power―have lost their belief in the Prosecutor s Office which was supposed to establish and promote the fairness and rule of law.
Prosecutors are not angels but men. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. Now it is time for the Prosecutor s Office in Korea to return to its original position in accordance with the principle of checks and balances and a functional separation of powers which gave birth to the Prosecutor s Office in the criminal justice system.
For this purpose, by analyzing impartial and proper methodological principles of comparative legal studies on the criminal justice system, this paper aims to provide the answers to the following questions: what and
why important is the principle of checks and balances and a functional separation of powers as a natural law; in what manner and degree does the criminal justice system of other states comply with the principle; and
what is the future direction and current problem of the criminal justice system of Korea from the perspective of such principle.
목차
I. 서론
II. 비교형사법적 연구의 목적과 방법
III. 자연법적 원칙: 기능적 권력분리를 통한 견제와 균형
IV. 전체론적 분석: 견제와 균형, 기능적 권력분리 원칙의 붕괴
VI. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 한국 형사사법제도에서의 견제와 균형 원칙에 대한 비교법적 연구
- 刑 事 政 策 제30권 제2호 목차
- 미투(Me Too)운동이 야기한 형사법적 쟁점 검토
- 검․경 수사권 조정 정부합의안에 대한 비판적 검토 및 합리적 대안 모색
- 수사절차에서 1차 수사종결권에 대한 고찰
- 검․경 수사권조정 합의안의 내용과 의미에 대한 일고
- 청와대의 ‘수사권 조정안’과 검찰 개혁
- 사법경찰관의 ‘1차적 수사종결권’의 법제화 방안
- 경찰 수사개혁의 성과와 과제
- 2018. 6. 21.자 수사권 조정 합의문상 사법경찰관의 불송치결정에 대한 통제 방법에 관한 헌법적 분석
- 검·경 수사지휘 논의에서 잊힌 문제-특별사법경찰관리에 대한 수사지휘-
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!