본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

원유로부터 listeria monocytogenes의 분리방법에 대한 비교시험

이용수 7

영문명
Comparison of methods for isolation of listeria monocytogenes from raw milk
발행기관
한국예방수의학회
저자명
강호조(Ho Jo Kang) 이철현(Chul Hyun Lee) 손원근(Won Geun Son) 김용환(Young Hwan Kim)
간행물 정보
『Korean Journal of Veterinary Public Health』Vol.19, No.2, 131~138쪽, 전체 8쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 면역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
1995.06.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Methods used to isolate Listeria monocytogenes were compared in artificially contaminated raw milk. Three selective plating media, including Lithium chloride-phenylethanol-moxalactam(LPM) agar, Oxford agar(OxA), and Modified-McBride Listeria agar(MMA), were compared by using the media to direct plating method. The greatest numbers of positive Listeria samples were obtained on MMA of the used direct plating media, and MMA proved to be useful as a screening tool but was not very selective, beacause that was more distributed with various other microorganisms. Listeria colonies on OxA were very easy to identify on these agars due to the blackening of coloines. In a comparative study of FDA or USDA methods and both modified methods for the detection of L. monocytogenes from raw milk, both modified methods were modified by the inclusion of additional plating media and by the inoculum using centrifugal precipitation of 50ml milk samples. In ability to isolate L. monocytogenes by either the modified FDA and USDA methods, the modified FDA and USDA methods isolated more positive from the raw milk samples than the FDA or USDA methods. Comparison of modified FDA and modified USDA indicated that both were equally effective for the enumeration of the L. monocytogenes in raw milk samples. The higher numbers of non-Listeria microorganisms were obtained using FDA and USDA methods than modified methods. The number of other microorganisms isolated by four isolation methods were 4 to 6 kinds. The bacterial strains isolated by these methods were Acinetobacter spp., In general, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp. and Micrococcus spp. grew on LPM, while only Acinetobacter spp. grew on OxA. Therefore, OxA media was better than LPM in isolating L. monocytogenes.

목차

ABSTRACT
서론
재료 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

강호조(Ho Jo Kang),이철현(Chul Hyun Lee),손원근(Won Geun Son),김용환(Young Hwan Kim). (1995).원유로부터 listeria monocytogenes의 분리방법에 대한 비교시험. Korean Journal of Veterinary Public Health, 19 (2), 131-138

MLA

강호조(Ho Jo Kang),이철현(Chul Hyun Lee),손원근(Won Geun Son),김용환(Young Hwan Kim). "원유로부터 listeria monocytogenes의 분리방법에 대한 비교시험." Korean Journal of Veterinary Public Health, 19.2(1995): 131-138

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제