충무공 이순신과 선조 -호성공신 선정 논란에 대한 검토를 중심으로-

• 영문명: Chunmugong Yi Sun-Sin and King Sunjo
• 발행기관: 순천향대학교 이순신연구소
• 저자명: 정해은(Jung, Hai-Un)
• 간행물 정보: 『이순신연구논총』제11호, 1~17쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.06.30

영문 초록

Once war was terminated, selection process for commendation carried out from March 1601 to October 1604. In discusion, ministers and officers suggested to select war heros first as a model and encourage people to sacrifice for country in next national crisis, however King Sunjo, ranaway from capital to Uijoo when japanese invaders approached, insisted on awarding his personal secretariats and deputies as if they did something great to save his country. He added honors criteria that Ming s emperor and army saved his country. Accordingly he deserved the highest feat because he ordered to call Ming s army. He acted as if many national war heroes and good subordinates were threat to his throne. Finally, he credited his secretariats and deputies as war heroes and many dead soldiers and sailors passed away wihtout citation. The runaway king tried to cover up his faults by twisting selection criteria and awarding secretariats! and deputies.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 임진왜란기 여론의 동향

1) 실추된 국왕의 위신

2) 이순신에 대한 평판

Ⅲ. 호성공신 선정 논란

1) 누가 明軍를 조선에 오게 했는가?

2) 내시․하인들의 공신 참여 문제

Ⅳ. 맺음말

키워드

선조 호성공신 Sunjo Ho-Seong-Kong-Sin