학술논문
마약류 자기사용죄에 있어서의 공소사실의 특정
이용수 28
- 영문명
- Count Specification in Illegal Drug Use Cases
- 발행기관
- 경희법학연구소
- 저자명
- 양동철(Yang, Dong-Chul)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경희법학』제44권 제1호, 35~71쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.03.30
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Article 254 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that “The Facts constituting the crime shall be stated clearly by specifying the time & date, place, and method of crime”. In case the facts constituting the crime(count) is not be
stated clearly, the public prosecution shall be dismissed by judgement. The legislative purport of ‘count specification’ is not only set limits to object of trials, but also protect the procedural rights of defendants. For that reason the time & date, place, and method of crime in the prosecution shall be stated clearly for defendants so as to exert their procedural rights without difficulty.
In the ‘illegal drug use case’, however, not a few suspects deny their crimes. In such circumstances, prosecutors have no choice but to presume the date of crime ust basing urine analysis or hair analysis. So, the facts constituting the crime have to be stated generally. The Supreme Court tended to take a generous stand on the issue of ‘count specification’ in illegal drug use cases before the 2000s.
However, in 1999, the Supreme Court dismissed ‘illegal drug use case’ just based on hair analysis. [Supreme Court Decision 1998Do3293 Delivered on June 11, 1999 [Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (Psychotropic)]. After that, the Supreme Court tends to judge illegal drug use cases on a case by case basis.
Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the standpoint of the Supreme Court and suggest a manifest criterion on that issue. Issues of this paper are admissibility & reliability of hair analysis as an evidence, count specification & object of trials in the ‘illegal drug use case’ and related problems. This paper reviews leading precedents on the issues and suggests possible solutions to the problems.
목차
l. 서론
ll. 공소사실 특정의 기준
lll. 모발감정의 증거능력과 증명력
lV. 관련 판례의 분석
V. 결 론 : 해결 방안의 제시
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!