2.2 mm 동축 소절개 백내장수술의 단기 임상 결과 비교

• 영문명: Comparative Study of Microcoaxial Cataract Surgery and Conventional Cataract Surgery
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 최진아 정성근 김현승,Jin A Choi, M.D., Sung Kun Chung, M.D, Ph.D., Hyun Seung Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume49,number6, 904~910쪽, 전체 7쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.06.15

영문 초록

Purpose: To compare the postoperative results of 2.2 mm microcoaxial cataract surgery (MCCS) and conventional 3.0 mm cataract surgery (CCS). Methods: This study included 30 patients (40 eyes): 17 patients (21 eyes) had microcoaxial cataract surgery using a 2.2 mm microcorneal incision, and 13 patients (19 eyes) had conventional cataract surgery using a 3.0 mm corneal incision. In these two groups, we measured phacoemulsification time, total phacoemulsification percentage, and effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) during cataract surgery. We compared corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, uncorrected visual acuity, best‐corrected visual acuity, and surgically, induced astigmatism (SIA) by corneal topography between the two groups preoperatively and at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months postoperatively. Results: There were significantly lower SIA (p=0.025) at postoperative day 1 in MCCS, and there was no significant difference after that. No difference in phacoemulsification time, total phacoemulsification percentage, EPT, corneal thickness, postoperative uncorrected visual acuity or corrected visual acuity was noted between MCCS and CCS. Conclusions: MCCS using a 2.2 mm small corneal incision appears to be a safe and advanced procedure with a smaller amount of surgically-induced astigmatism during the early postoperative period. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 49(6):904-910, 2008

키워드

Conventional cataract surgery, Microcoaxial cataract surgery, Microincision, Microincisional cataract surgery, Phacoemulsification