배아의 윤리

• 영문명: Ethics of Embryo: Debate between Person and Life in the embryonic Problems
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소(의생명과학법센터)
• 저자명: 이을상(Lee Eul Sang)
• 간행물 정보: 『의생명과학과 법』제9권, 91~119쪽, 전체 29쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.06.30

영문 초록

This thesis is a study on an embryo has the condition of being human or not. Someone has to be regarded as human being, he/she has a right of living, which is derived from the being a person in the moral sense. We have naturally thought an embryo is human, but today it becomes problematic whether an embryo is a human being or not. This argument has been raised by a rapid developing of biotechnology such as prenatal genetic screening, embryonic reproduction etc. In the biotechnology an embryo is surely not regarded as a human being, but only a living material. It can cause a deep moral injure to think an embryo is not a human being. For human being is a person in the moral sense, and a person has been only thought that can make us live freely. At last we have human dignity, when we live as a person. But the thought that an embryo is not a human being has brought about the possibility of a human being without person , which is conceived by P. Singer in his Practical Ethics(1991). Further more Singer criticizes a Kant s view of human dignity as a speciesm in the basis of a concept of a human being without person. In this paper I have examined a historical origin of Singer s concepts, a human being without person firstly and a speciesm especially in comparison with Kant s view of human dignity nextly. I have also examined that Kant s concept of autonomy has to be substituted by self-disposability in Singer s bioethical viewpoint, but Singer s viewpoint is also criticised by Sandel s ethics of genetic enhancement lastly.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 인격 없는 인간 의 출현

Ⅲ. 인격과 인간존엄의 법식

Ⅳ. 인간존엄 대 종차별주의

Ⅴ. 생명의 신성불가침 대 처분 가능성

Ⅵ. 맺는말

참고문헌

[ABSTRACT]

키워드

인격 없는 인간 종차별주의 생명의 자기처분성 인간 존엄 자유주의적 우생학 a human being without person specism self-disposability of life human dignity liberalist eugenics