Monstrosity in the Enlightenment's Utopian Projects of Frankenstein and the French Revolution

• 발행기관: 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소
• 저자명: Mikyung Park
• 간행물 정보: 『영미연구』제30집, 57~84쪽, 전체 27쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.02.28

영문 초록

This essay argues that Frankenstein and the French Revolution correspondingly present the limitations of evolution and revolution, both of which are grounded in the Enlightenment belief in the capacity of reason. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France focus on individual scientific and collective political experiments on better kinds of creatures and societies, respectively. The Republic of Geneva, the hometown of Victor Frankenstein in Shelley's novel, plays the role of connecting Shelley's work to Burke's in terms of the fictional realization of a political entity other than a monarchy. As part of fulfilling the infinite progress of human history, the French Revolution planned to establish a republican government and it succeeded until the emergence of Napoleon. Then, Geneva seems to perfect an ideal political model of republicanism free from tyranny and despotism. The creation of a new species and the formation of a new government reflect utopian projects to bring bliss to humankind. However, both the individual and collective approaches to utopian projects have monstrous results. Monstrosity hinges both upon Shelley's and Burke's critique of failed Enlightenment projects made manifest in the violation of nature, which occurred in the French Revolution and in Victor's effort to procreate with no female engagement. What's worse, Victor's creature acts as the catalyst to reveal the apogee of social injustice prevalent in Geneva, as shown in Justine's trial. In particular, her innocence is sacrificed for the sake of one of the privileged members of Geneva, namely, Victor Frankenstein. For this reason, the Republic of Geneva apparently demonstrates the limits of its founding principle of republicanism; it remains a partial achievement. Despite Shelley's sympathetic treatment of the monster, both Shelley and Burke share conservatism that is critical of radical attempts to reform society on account of mere reason. Therefore, Shelley critiques Victor's transgression of nature and for the most part agrees with Burke's interpretation of the French Revolution as a monstrous tragic-comedy. Insofar as the theories of enlightenment, evolution, and revolution do not sufficiently acknowledge their limitations and self-destructiveness, each ultimately undermines the values that led to its inception and its ensuing development. Shelley's novel and Burke's work are two examples that demonstrate the very possibility and limits of the Enlightenment's utopian projects on the basis of human rationality; both of them bear witness to the critical spirit integral to enlightenment in Kant's terms.

목차

1. Introduction

2. The Enlightenment, Evolution, and Revolution

3. Monstrosity of Abstract Reason and the Revolution in Burke's Reflections

4. Monstrosity of Science and Republicanism in Shelley's Frankenstein

5. Conclusion

Works Cited

Abstract

키워드

계몽 진화 프랑켄슈타인 프랑스혁명 괴물성 공화주의 유토피아 Enlightenment evolution Frankenstein French Revolution monstrosity republicanism utopia