학술논문
결과적 가중범의 미수에 관한 소고
이용수 71
- 영문명
- Consideration on An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime
- 발행기관
- 한국형사법학회
- 저자명
- 최정일(Choi, Jung-Il)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제25권 제3호, 33~56쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.09.30
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Before describing An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime, First, The type of An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime should be explicitly established. That is, This type is only limited as one case; Basic crime merely extended to the stage of An attempted crime but has finally caused heavy effects. Second, Two prerequisites should be clearly set; a) The Fulfillment of Immediacy b) The Punishment of Basic Crime. a) The Fulfillment of Immediacy means that The Act-related Consequentially Aggravated Crimes can be contained in arguing An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime but The Result-related Consequentially Aggravated Crime should be excluded from debating An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime. b) The Punishment of Basic Crime means that if the basic crime is not unpunishable it should be thought that there is not the basic crime. therefore, the general and typical danger which is immediately linked to heavy effects(mostly injury or death) doesn`t exist in the basic crime. After all, 'Unpunishable Basic Crime' - this term represents that the basic crime not actually exist. I have an evident opinion that An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime can only be meaningful to the Act-related Consequentially Aggravated Crimes which have the punishable basic crimes.
Also, there are usually two theories concerning An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime. One is the affirmative view which supports that An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime is built, The other is the negative view which denies that An attempted crime of Consequentially Aggravated Crime is built. The negative view is the position which both the Supreme court and most scholars advocate. so to speak, The negative view has been regarded as the majority opinion. so far, they have insisted that all the punishment regulations of An attempted crime regarding Consequentially Aggravated Crime only resulted from legislator's mistakes. Considering the substance of Consequentially Aggravated Crime; In special, Principle of Immediacy, I think that the affirmative view is far more rational than the negative view.
In current criminal law, Not only the basis of aggravated punishment but also the extent of aggravated punishment should we consider. In examining our regulations of Consequentially Aggravated Crime, In terms of the sentence, we can notice that the regulations of Consequentially Aggravated Crime are much heavier than those of the Simple Combination Form(a deliberate offense and a criminal negligence) or even the deliberate offense of heavy effects(death or injury). Appropriate reduction of sentences are certainly needed. With the proper revisions, The regulations of Consequentially Aggravated Crime can correspond to the principle of responsibility.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 논의의 전제 조건
Ⅲ. 기수일원설
Ⅳ. 미수일원설
Ⅴ. 기수ㆍ미수이원설
Ⅵ. 기본범죄의 미수와 가중형벌의 임의적 감경 원용설
Ⅶ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 다문화가정에서 미성년자약취 및 국외이송죄의 문제
- 검사에 의한 증거개시 거부의 소송법적 효과
- 미국 형법상 위법성조각사유의 전제사실의 착오
- 아청법 제2조 제5항에서 아동ㆍ청소년의 의미
- 형사절차상 영장실질심문조서의 증거능력 규제방안
- 교통사고처리특례법의 문제점과 존폐논의에 대한 검토
- 공소사실의 동일성
- 횡령죄의 보호의 정도와 기/미수의 구별기준
- 개정형법상 강간죄 및 유사강간죄 해석ㆍ입법론
- 형법 제33조 ‘신분관계’와 공범
- 결과적 가중범의 미수에 관한 소고
- 사회안전과 형사실체법의 변화, 과제와 전망
- 불법원인위탁과 횡령죄 성부의 재검토
- 위험형법론으로서 일반예방론에 대한 고찰
- “횡령” 개념에 관한 고찰
- 사회안전과 형사소송법의 변화와 과제
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!