국가행위이론의 다의성과 미국의 국가행위이론

• 영문명: Review on the Act of the State Doctrine in the United States
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소
• 저자명: 김민서(Kim, Min-Seo)
• 간행물 정보: 『원광법학』제26권 제4호, 401~420쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.12.30

영문 초록

The act of state doctrine is derived from two statements by the Supreme Court of the United States. In Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897), the Supreme Court said, “Every sovereign State is bound to respect the independence of every other sovereign State, and the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory. Redress of grievances by reason of such acts must be obtained through the means open to be availed of by sovereign powers as between themselves.” In Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 428, the Supreme Court held that “the Judicial Branch will not examine the validity of a taking of property within its own territory by a foreign sovereign government.” This is to deal with the question as follows: “Are those two cases the same or should they be distinguished each other?”

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 국가행위이론의 유형

Ⅲ. 미국 국가행위이론의 원칙과 예외

Ⅳ. 비교 분석과 평가를 통한 미국 국가행위이론의 재구성

V. 결 론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

국가행위이론 국가면제 물적 면제 수용 국제법 act of state doctrine state immunity immunity ratione materiae expropriation international law