학술논문
‘실질적 관련’은 어디까지인가?
이용수 103
- 영문명
- ‘Substantial Connection'? - A Comment on the Standard for International Jurisdiction under the Korean International Private Law in its Supreme Court case -
- 발행기관
- 원광대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 최영란(Choi, Young-Ran)
- 간행물 정보
- 『원광법학』제26권 제4호, 525~570쪽, 전체 45쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.12.30
8,200원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This is a comment on Case No. 2010da18355 of the Korean Supreme Court, which was decided on July 15, 2010. The paper mainly focuses on how to define the concept of 'substantial connection(s)' as a basic standard to determine whether a Korean court has international jurisdiction over a foreign-related case, which one or both parties is(are) alien(s), and/or subsequently, whether the court may excercise its jurisdiction over the case. The legal basis is Article 2 of the Korean International Private Law(KIPL) enacted in 2001, and other related provisions of the Korean Civil Procedure on jurisdiction or venue.
The case at hand was brought by parents of one of the deceased flight attendants employed by the foreign defendant, Air China, of which plane was crashed into a hill near Busan, Korea, killing 129 of 166 passengers (Koreans as well as Chinese) and the defendant's employees on board, on April 15, 2002. The parents continued their lawsuit in Korea against the defendant, requesting for damages based on the employment contract between the deceased employee and the defendant, and on tort occurred in Korea.
The court reviewed whether it was competent to hear the case, by considering factors related to some theories or ideals, including fairness, equality between parties, speedy trial, etc., on how to allocate jurisdiction among courts in different countries, which might derive from some domestic theories on selecting venues among other domestic courts. The trial court rejected its jurisdiction, holding that this case is "substantially connected" to China, since the two parties are the Chinese corporation and nationals. When it reached the Supreme Court, the Court granted jurisdiction on Korean courts, and remanded the case to the trial court for further review on the merits.
The main argument of this paper is whether the Korean court has substantial connections with parties or with the legal dispute, and how to define the term, 'substantial connections' after considering relevant international factors on rules of jurisdiction and even those of choice of law.
The paper looks over how the concept of 'substantial connection' was introduced to the KIPL, and implemented in its courts' rulings, especially in this case. One of the major references for 'substantial connection' is the rule of U.S. jurisdiction, "minimum contacts," of which backgrounds and development will be slightly mentioned, in order to search for how the 'substantial connection' concept can be understood or applied to our future Korean cases. Then, the paper focuses on the legal analysis by the Supreme Court case to look for better legal guidelines to exercise jurisdiction by the Korean courts over the foreign-related cases in the future.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 대상판결의 사안 및 하급심의 국제재판관할권 판단 기준
Ⅲ. 대상판결의 국제재판관할권 논점
Ⅳ. 연 구
V. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
국제재판관할권
국제재판관할권 판단기준
실질적 관련
토지관할
준거법
국제재판관할배분이념
미국 재판관할
최소한의 접촉
국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약
International Jurisdiction
Standard to determine International Jurisdiction
Substantial Connection
Legal Dispute with Foreign Elements
Substantial
Choice of Law
Allocation of International Jurisdiction
Minimum Contacts
United Nations Convention on the International Sales of Goods(CISG)
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 일본 아동부양수당제도에 관한 연구
- 선행자백과 등가치진술의 이론
- 헌법재판에서의 헌법 또는 법률의 해석 적용
- 국제상사중재에 있어서 무국적중재판정의 의의와 승인 및 집행
- 일본의 상표불사용취소심판제도와 그 특징에 관한 비교법적 연구
- 당사자소송
- 민간투자사업에 있어서 법령변경에 따른 위험과 그 배분
- 类型化视野下撤销诉讼适用对象的重新界定
- 형사절차상 연하물 강제배출의 허용성과 그 한계
- 보호감호의 재도입론에 대한 검토
- 독일의 환자사전의사표시법
- ‘실질적 관련’은 어디까지인가?
- 当代中国宪法发展的新领域
- 이주근로자의 건강권보호의 문제점과 개선방안
- 국가행위이론의 다의성과 미국의 국가행위이론
- 일본 형사재판에서의 국민 참여에 관한 쟁점과 그 시사점
- 转基因农产品对粮食安全的影响及其法律规制
- 中国劳动合同法的立法现状与热点问题
- 洗钱罪上游犯罪的立法比较研究
- 의료관광에 따른 의료분쟁에 있어서 국제재판관할
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!