학술논문
지주회사에서 주주의 법적 이익보호와 이사의 책임문제
이용수 54
- 영문명
- The Shareholders' Interest and Directors' Liability in Holding Company
- 발행기관
- 원광대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 황근수(Hwang, Keoun-Soo)
- 간행물 정보
- 『원광법학』제25권 제2호, 113~140쪽, 전체 27쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.06.30
6,040원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In the view of korean Commercial Law(corporate law), shareholders' interest protection and directors' liability in Holding Company are related with shareholder's interest protection closely. Holding Company is a company which possesses shares of the subsidiary and depends on the interest from the subsidiary. so that, the shareholder of Holding Company could not help concerning with operating business of subsidiary, Holding Company and subsidiary(child company) hold a equity respectively and the companies could hardly exercise the legal right.
Being related with shareholder's interest, when assets of subsidiary are large one, the voting right in the company would be given to the shareholder. In this case, the basis of this theory has been based on piercing the corporate veil or pass through theory in conforming to case by case. However, now codification in korean Commercial Code would be discussed with a voting right, (double)derivative suit and an account inspection of subsidiary in Holding Company group.
Also, in the concerned with director's liability of Holding Company, that of a commercial company applies in korean Commercial Law. In the operating Holding Company, to compared with director's liability(§399) of korean Commercial Code, the shareholder as Holding Company itself and subsidiary could exercise the right. But pure Holding Company do not like that of operating Holding Company, because the Company holds shares and dominates subsidiary only. So that, the shareholder's protection of pure Holding Company could not apply ordinary rules, therefore we must regulate director's liability by another provision in Holding Company group.
Furthermore, it do not meet that outsider directors' authority and liability is the same thing with that of an executive director. The outsider directors of (Holding) Company focuses on management supervision to assure transparent operating business, therefore, they differ from an executive director or executive officer. Like this, it is not rightful that the liability of outsider director, executive director and executive officer are the same respectively, because of the difference to related business and gathering information extent. I think that it is required to establish director's liability limit, conforming with outsider directors' introduction to supervise director's business execution.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 논의의 배경 및 필요성
Ⅲ. 주주의 법적 이익보호
Ⅳ. 지주회사 이사의 책임문제
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 표현증명
- 경찰행정법상 경찰의 정보수집활동과 정보적 자기결정권
- Is Agent Orange a Stop Sign to Block Aliens from Entering into United States Courts?
- 대집행의 요건
- 미국법상 고용분쟁 중재제도
- 國際去來에 있어서 仲裁合意의 準據法 決定에 관한 考察
- The mainstream of the RTA case‐law in the WTO Dispute Settlement System
- 인터넷 뱅킹의 부정거래와 그에 대한 책임의 귀속
- 피고인의 방어권보장 관련 개정 형사소송법 재검토
- 미국연방증거규칙상 성격증거의 취급
- 판례를 통해 본 미국 공정근로기준법상의 근로자의 의미
- 國家戰略産業의 保護와 外國人의 敵對的 M&A
- 지주회사에서 주주의 법적 이익보호와 이사의 책임문제
- 자원 소유권의 귀속
- 변론종결 후의 승계인에 대한 기판력ㆍ집행력의 확장
- 미국법상 온라인 라이센스 계약의 유효성
- 정보통신분야 개인정보의 형법적 보호
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!