본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

海叟 金禹鼎의 經學에 관한 일고찰

이용수 31

영문명
A Study on Confucian Classics of Haesu Kim U-jeong
발행기관
동남어문학회
저자명
장병한(Jang, Byoung-Han)
간행물 정보
『동남어문논집』동남어문논집 제33집, 201~223쪽, 전체 23쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.05.31
5,560

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Haesu Kim U-jeong (1551, 6th year of King Myeongjo's reign 〜1630, 8th year of King Injo's reign) lived in Dongnae, Busan, from the end of the 16th century to the first half of the 17th century. He joined Joseon's battle against the Japanese invasion, but as Dongnae Castle collapsed, he was taken as a captive to Japan at the age of 42 (25th year of King Seonjo's reign,1592), where he suffered for 8 years. At 49 (32nd year of King Seonjo, 1599), he returned home. He was a scholar. His world of Confucian classics belonged to the emergence period of Korea's Confucian classics in the first half of the 17th century. His understanding of the Doctrine of the Mean was overall based on Juhui's annotations, as well as on the expanded interpretation of the Theory of Cheyong (Substance and Function), a major principle system of Neo-Confucianism. Nonetheless, his understanding of Confucian classics did not simply follow the theory of Chu-tzu but instead involved his own theories. For instance, of Cheyong, he emphasized Yong, namely, perception. He also stressed the reality and routineness of Jung (中) of things, namely, Sijung (時中), Haengsa (行事), and Do (道) out of Seong (性), Do (道) and Gyeo (敎), thus differentiating himself from the Neo-Confucianism system of Juhui. Such understanding of Confucian classics did not adhere to contemplative principle of human nature such as the key Neo-Confucianism theme, Igiron (理氣論), Sadan (四端) and Chiljeongnon (七情論), but instead were somewhat similar to the viewpoint of Hangang Jeong Gu (1543〜1620) who emphasized realistic human nature cultivation and inner mind training, namely, practical Neo-Confucianism. Haesu's understanding of Confucian classics in the first half of the 17th century did not yet embrace the stimulating and resisting meaning of the Confucian classic world of Pojeo Jo Ik, Seogye Park Se-dang, and Baekho Yun Hyu who were active after the second half of the 17th century. However, one century earlier than these scholars, Haesu's Yeongnam School Confucian classics system, which was based on reality, routineness, and practicality, was yet different from Gyeongseobyeonui (經書辨疑) of Sagye Kim Jang-saeng (1548〜1631) who was a disciple of Yulgok in the same period, and who tried to further solidify the exclusive position of the Chu-tzu theory in the Confucian classics as a member of the early Giho School. (Youngsan University)

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 해수의 工夫論 및 忠義 實踐論
Ⅲ. 해수의 『中庸章句』에 대한 이해
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

장병한(Jang, Byoung-Han). (2012).海叟 金禹鼎의 經學에 관한 일고찰. 동남어문논집, 33 , 201-223

MLA

장병한(Jang, Byoung-Han). "海叟 金禹鼎의 經學에 관한 일고찰." 동남어문논집, 33.(2012): 201-223

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제